CAJ | 학술논문

“不充分决定命题”是当代科学哲学讨论的经典问题之一，奎因作为这一时期重要的哲学家对此问题的论述至关重要。总的来看，奎因对“不充分决定命题”的论述是复杂多变的，但我们还是可以发现其核心内容（即科学理论不是被经验证据所严格决定的，经验和理论之间不存在完全严格的逻辑关系）一直保持不变，但与之相关的哲学倾向却摇摆不定。事实上，我们只有将“不充分决定命题”放在奎因的整个哲学体系中，放在他的核心观念的张力中才能理解这种态度变化的根本原因。
“불충분결정명제”시당대과학철학토론적경전문제지일，규인작위저일시기중요적철학가대차문제적논술지관중요。총적래간，규인대“불충분결정명제”적논술시복잡다변적，단아문환시가이발현기핵심내용（즉과학이론불시피경험증거소엄격결정적，경험화이론지간불존재완전엄격적라집관계）일직보지불변，단여지상관적철학경향각요파불정。사실상，아문지유장“불충분결정명제”방재규인적정개철학체계중，방재타적핵심관념적장력중재능리해저충태도변화적근본원인。
the Underdetermination thesis is one of the important issues in modem philophy, Quine is the most well-known proponents of the thesis, and his understanding of the thesis plays a constructive role in epistemology. Quine had discussed the problem many times in his writings, But he was changing his idea all the time. Above all, we can draw the conclusion in the recent literature that Quine underdetermination thesis states that any given set of data can always be represented by different, conceptually incompatible accounts.