河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2013年
4期
52~59
,共null页
个人自由 社会连带 国家干预 数量关系 法理限度
箇人自由 社會連帶 國傢榦預 數量關繫 法理限度
개인자유 사회련대 국가간예 수량관계 법리한도
individual freedom; social solidarity; state intervention; mathematical relation; jurisprudential limit
在消极自由而不是积极自由的范畴内,如何消解个人自由与国家干预的冲突,进而为控制国家干预措施提供理论支持,是现代法治的核心命题。个体性和社会性是个人存在的两种属性,个体性对应个人自由的存在状态,社会性对应社会连带的存在状态。在个人存在之目的下,个人自由与社会连带始终处于紧张关系之中,个人自由限制社会连带,社会连带限制个人自由。个人自由无需国家干预来保护和协调,国家干预的目的是为了实现个人存在目的之下的社会连带。个人自由是国家干预的反对力量,社会连带是国家干预的限制力量。来自个人自由的拷问和社会连带的限制,是衡量国家干预合法性的标准,国家干预的终极目标应该是使个人存在质量最大化。
在消極自由而不是積極自由的範疇內,如何消解箇人自由與國傢榦預的遲突,進而為控製國傢榦預措施提供理論支持,是現代法治的覈心命題。箇體性和社會性是箇人存在的兩種屬性,箇體性對應箇人自由的存在狀態,社會性對應社會連帶的存在狀態。在箇人存在之目的下,箇人自由與社會連帶始終處于緊張關繫之中,箇人自由限製社會連帶,社會連帶限製箇人自由。箇人自由無需國傢榦預來保護和協調,國傢榦預的目的是為瞭實現箇人存在目的之下的社會連帶。箇人自由是國傢榦預的反對力量,社會連帶是國傢榦預的限製力量。來自箇人自由的拷問和社會連帶的限製,是衡量國傢榦預閤法性的標準,國傢榦預的終極目標應該是使箇人存在質量最大化。
재소겁자유이불시적겁자유적범주내,여하소해개인자유여국가간예적충돌,진이위공제국가간예조시제공이론지지,시현대법치적핵심명제。개체성화사회성시개인존재적량충속성,개체성대응개인자유적존재상태,사회성대응사회련대적존재상태。재개인존재지목적하,개인자유여사회련대시종처우긴장관계지중,개인자유한제사회련대,사회련대한제개인자유。개인자유무수국가간예래보호화협조,국가간예적목적시위료실현개인존재목적지하적사회련대。개인자유시국가간예적반대역량,사회련대시국가간예적한제역량。래자개인자유적고문화사회련대적한제,시형량국가간예합법성적표준,국가간예적종겁목표응해시사개인존재질량최대화。
:In the eoneept of negative freedom rather than positive freedom, it is a key thesis for modern rule of law how to decrease the conflicts between individual freedom and state intervention and then to provide jurisprudential support for opposing and restricting state intervention measures. Individuality and sociality are two kinds of characteristic of individual existence. Individuality is equal to existing status of individual freedom while sociality corresponds to existing status of social solidarity. Under the goal of individual existence, the relations between individual freedom and social solidarity are strained all the time. Individual freedom restricts social solidarity while social solidarity restricts individual freedom. Individual freedom needs no protection and coordination of state intervention, and the goal of state intervention is to realize social solidarity under the aim of individual existence. Individual freedom is opposition power for state intervention, and social solidarity is limit power for state intervention. The opposition from individual freedom and the restriction from social solidarity are legitimaey standards to judge state intervention, and the ultimate goal of state intervention is to maximize the quality of individual existence.