CAJ | 학술논문

国际反兴奋剂机构（WADA）的《反兴奋剂条例》实施后，其中的运动员行踪报告制度引起了体育界的高度争议。许多运动员、体育组织指责其侵犯了运动员的隐私权、休息权、人格尊严和行动自由等，而国际反兴奋剂机构则坚决捍卫该规则的客观需要和正当性。就司法判例来看，行踪规则的合法性和合理性都得到了承认，但体现出衡量当事人过错和程序正当性的因素，反兴奋剂机构也在作出回应并表现出完善其保护运动员隐私权的趋势。
국제반흥강제궤구（WADA）적《반흥강제조례》실시후，기중적운동원행종보고제도인기료체육계적고도쟁의。허다운동원、체육조직지책기침범료운동원적은사권、휴식권、인격존엄화행동자유등，이국제반흥강제궤구칙견결한위해규칙적객관수요화정당성。취사법판례래간，행종규칙적합법성화합이성도득도료승인，단체현출형량당사인과착화정서정당성적인소，반흥강제궤구야재작출회응병표현출완선기보호운동원은사권적추세。
The whereabouts reporting system of athletes in the Anti - Doping Regulation of the International Anti - Doping Agency （WADA） has ignited many controversies in sports field. Many athletes and sports organizations have accused it of violating the privacy of the athletes, the right to rest, the right of human dignity and freedom of movement, while the Anti - Doping Agencies resolutely defend the necessity and legitimacy of the rules. In review of judicial precedents, the legality and rationality of the whereabouts rules have been recognized, but the factors measuring the faults and due process are also witnessed. The Anti - Doping Agencies are responding and improving their protection of athletes＂ privacy.