CAJ | 학술논문

错案追究制受到理论界的广泛批评，错案追究权的来源、错案概念内涵和错案追究程序都成为诟病焦点。错案追究制的运行实效极差，存在受错案追究的个案少和错案曝光率高、法院独立审判权受限和错案责任独担、问责机制内部化和错案利害关系群体化三大矛盾。突破该制度应从外部着眼，深化审判公开，在全国人大下设错案惩戒机构来主导错案追究，同时应界定统一合理的错案标准和创设合理的追究程序。
착안추구제수도이론계적엄범비평，착안추구권적래원、착안개념내함화착안추구정서도성위후병초점。착안추구제적운행실효겁차，존재수착안추구적개안소화착안폭광솔고、법원독립심판권수한화착안책임독담、문책궤제내부화화착안리해관계군체화삼대모순。돌파해제도응종외부착안，심화심판공개，재전국인대하설착안징계궤구래주도착안추구，동시응계정통일합리적착안표준화창설합리적추구정서。
The misjudged case investigation system has received widespread criticism for the sources of investigation power, concepts of misjudged cases, and the procedures. The system is extremely ineffective in operation. There are three contradictions in the system：（1） Reinvestigated cases are few in number but high in frequency of exposure; （2） The court!s power of independent trial is con-fined but the responsibility of misjudging cases should be taken alone; （3） The system of accountability is carried out within the court but misjudged cases put lots of parties at stake. Breakthrough on this system should be started from the exterior, advocating public trial, and setting up institutions under the National People＇s Congress exclusively for dealing with misjudged cases. Furthermore, ra-tional standards and procedures for investigating misjudged cases should be uni-fied.