CAJ | 학술논문

当前,学术界和司法部门在室外艺术作品合理使用的认定标准上均存在诸多困惑,特别是对＂以营利为目的的再行使用＂是否属于合理使用尚未形成共识。通过对现行法律、学理观点与典型判决的梳理与剖析,针对我国《著作权法》第22条第1款第（10）项提出如下修改建议：对设置或者陈列在室外公共场所的艺术作品进行临摹、绘画、摄影、录像并向公众提供,但不得以该艺术作品的相同方式复制、陈列以及公开传播,不得以再现该作品的艺术造型为主要用途。
당전,학술계화사법부문재실외예술작품합리사용적인정표준상균존재제다곤혹,특별시대＂이영리위목적적재행사용＂시부속우합리사용상미형성공식。통과대현행법률、학리관점여전형판결적소리여부석,침대아국《저작권법》제22조제1관제（10）항제출여하수개건의：대설치혹자진렬재실외공공장소적예술작품진행림모、회화、섭영、록상병향공음제공,단불득이해예술작품적상동방식복제、진렬이급공개전파,불득이재현해작품적예술조형위주요용도。
For a long time, fair use in the area of copyright has been regarded as the Sphinx Riddle. Be- hind this designed system is the aggregate measurement between the private rights and interests and the public interests. Even nowadays there are many perplexities for the academia and the judiciary in the aspect of the recognized standard for fair use of outdoor art works. In particular,there is no con- sensus on whether the further use with the purpose of seeking profit belongs to fair use. By arranging and analyzing the existing law, academic viewpoints and typical judgments, this article puts forward the advice of modification as follows：in the light of the subparagraph （10）, the first paragraph of arti- cle 22 in Chinese Copyright Law, when copying, drawing, photographing or video recording of an ar- tistic work located or on display in an outdoor public place and providing it to the public, you should not copy, display or provide it to the public in the same mode of the original artistic work, or make reproduction of its＇ artistic modeling as the main use.