海南大学学报:人文社会科学版
海南大學學報:人文社會科學版
해남대학학보:인문사회과학판
Humanities & Social Sciences Journal of Hainan University
2013年
3期
99~106
,共null页
常规 例外 启示 理性
常規 例外 啟示 理性
상규 예외 계시 이성
norm ; exception ; inspiration ; rationality
施米特的法哲学思想以“例外”(Ausnahme)为标志,凯尔森的法哲学思想以“基础规范”(Grundnorm)、“常规”(Norm)为标志。两者之间的冲突,远非20世纪30年代“谁是宪法的守护者”那场论战所能涵盖。除了“宪法的守护者”之争外,两人还有更深层次的冲突:启示与理性以及圣经旧约与新约的冲突。这一冲突恰恰昭示出现代法哲学与政治哲学的最核心问题——实际也是西方思想的关键问题!施米特没有回避这一思想争执,他创建的政治宪法学,将凯尔森的纯粹法思想融人到自己的法哲学理论之中,从而既保留了启蒙运动以来的“理性”地位;又以“例外”昭示现代人:“启示”并没有被“理性”所击溃。
施米特的法哲學思想以“例外”(Ausnahme)為標誌,凱爾森的法哲學思想以“基礎規範”(Grundnorm)、“常規”(Norm)為標誌。兩者之間的遲突,遠非20世紀30年代“誰是憲法的守護者”那場論戰所能涵蓋。除瞭“憲法的守護者”之爭外,兩人還有更深層次的遲突:啟示與理性以及聖經舊約與新約的遲突。這一遲突恰恰昭示齣現代法哲學與政治哲學的最覈心問題——實際也是西方思想的關鍵問題!施米特沒有迴避這一思想爭執,他創建的政治憲法學,將凱爾森的純粹法思想融人到自己的法哲學理論之中,從而既保留瞭啟矇運動以來的“理性”地位;又以“例外”昭示現代人:“啟示”併沒有被“理性”所擊潰。
시미특적법철학사상이“예외”(Ausnahme)위표지,개이삼적법철학사상이“기출규범”(Grundnorm)、“상규”(Norm)위표지。량자지간적충돌,원비20세기30년대“수시헌법적수호자”나장론전소능함개。제료“헌법적수호자”지쟁외,량인환유경심층차적충돌:계시여이성이급골경구약여신약적충돌。저일충돌흡흡소시출현대법철학여정치철학적최핵심문제——실제야시서방사상적관건문제!시미특몰유회피저일사상쟁집,타창건적정치헌법학,장개이삼적순수법사상융인도자기적법철학이론지중,종이기보류료계몽운동이래적“이성”지위;우이“예외”소시현대인:“계시”병몰유피“이성”소격궤。
Carl Schmitt' s thought about philosophy of right takes exception (Ausnahme) as the mark, while Hans Kelsen' s takes basic Grundnorm or norm as the mark. The conflict between them could not be included in the controversy about who is the guarantor of constitution in the 1930s. Apart from this, they have deeper con- flict between inspiration and rationality as well as the Old Testament and the New Testament. The conflicts ex- pose the core problem about the philosophy of rights and political philosophy, which is also the key problem of western thought. Carl Schmitt doesn' t avoid this conflict and establishes the Constitutional Theory, which ab- sorbs Kelsen' s Pure Theory of Law into his theory of philosophy of rights. Thus Schmitt maintains not only the position of rationality after the Enlightenment but also makes clear to the Modernist with exception that inspiration is not defeated by rationality.