CAJ | 학술논문

顾颉刚通过《周易》卦爻辞所见故事的考证，认为其制作年代在周初，这一结论得到了学者们的赞同。他通过考证认为，《说卦传》和《系辞传》观象制器章皆出自西汉人之手，这些推断是不能成立的。顾先生这些推断产生问题的原因在于他一定要证明《易传》中牵涉古史帝系人物的说法是后人伪造的。
고힐강통과《주역》괘효사소견고사적고증，인위기제작년대재주초，저일결론득도료학자문적찬동。타통과고증인위，《설괘전》화《계사전》관상제기장개출자서한인지수，저사추단시불능성립적。고선생저사추단산생문제적원인재우타일정요증명《역전》중견섭고사제계인물적설법시후인위조적。
Basing on the stories reflected in the judgments and line statements of the Zhouyi, Gu Jiegang concludes that the judgments and line statements of the Zhouyi were composed in the onset of the Zhou dynasty, which is agreed on by many other scholars. Through textual research, he contends that the chapter concerning ＂inventing devices by observing images＂ in Shuo gua zhuan （Ex- plaining the Trigrams） and Xi ci zhuan （Commentary on the Appended Phrases） were composed by the Western Han （206 BCE -9 CE） scholars, which is untenable. The reason for the problems caused by his inference is that he obstinately attempts to demonstrate that the legendary sage rulers mentioned in the Commentaries on the Changes were fabricated by later generations.