CAJ | 학술논문

在《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》第三条中，马克思基于新的实践唯物主义立场，剖析了18世纪法国唯物主义哲学历史观的两大理论缺陷，揭示了实践是环境、教育及人自身形成与改变的共同根基。恩格斯所做的四处修改，没有改变马克思的原则立场和根本观点，但的确存在内容表述的不同和一定程度的思想差异，效果有利有弊。回归马克思稿本，有利于展现第三条的思想原韵。
재《관우비이파합적제강》제삼조중，마극사기우신적실천유물주의립장，부석료18세기법국유물주의철학역사관적량대이론결함，게시료실천시배경、교육급인자신형성여개변적공동근기。은격사소주적사처수개，몰유개변마극사적원칙립장화근본관점，단적학존재내용표술적불동화일정정도적사상차이，효과유리유폐。회귀마극사고본，유리우전현제삼조적사상원운。
As far as the third argument of Theses on Feuerbach, Marx who adopted a new practical materialist standpoint stated two major theoretical defects in the 18thcentury French materialist philo-sophical conception of history and pointed out that practice was the common foundation for environ-ment, and education that had an influence on human beings. Although not making any way change in the principles and basic viewpoints held by Marx, Engels applied a different expressive way and repre-sent a somewhat different thinking to his four revisions, which had advantages and disadvantages but still kept the original thread of thought of the third argument.