产业经济研究
產業經濟研究
산업경제연구
Industrial Economics Research
2013年
4期
21~29
,共null页
低碳视角 环境规制 技术创新 波特假说 门槛效应
低碳視角 環境規製 技術創新 波特假說 門檻效應
저탄시각 배경규제 기술창신 파특가설 문함효응
low-carbon perspective; environmental regulation; technological innovation; Porter hypothesis; threshold effect
“波特假说”认为合理设置的环境规制政策在长期能够刺激企业进行技术创新，产生创新补偿效应，从而弥补因规制增加的成本，因此发挥规制的创新效应是实现经济发展与环境保护双赢的关键。文章运用2000—2010年中国29个地区的面板数据，通过系统GMM和门槛回归方法，在低碳视角下检验“波特假说”是否存在及存在的条件并确定最优规制水平。结果表明环境规制对创新的激励作用具有一定的滞后性，在当期阻碍技术创新，在滞后期促进创新且在滞后二期促进作用最明显；环境规制强度与技术创新之间存在三重门槛效应，规制强度较低时规制对创新的影响表现为一种潜动力，不足以引发创新活动的开展，在最优规制水平显著促进创新，强度过高时促进作用减弱。
“波特假說”認為閤理設置的環境規製政策在長期能夠刺激企業進行技術創新，產生創新補償效應，從而瀰補因規製增加的成本，因此髮揮規製的創新效應是實現經濟髮展與環境保護雙贏的關鍵。文章運用2000—2010年中國29箇地區的麵闆數據，通過繫統GMM和門檻迴歸方法，在低碳視角下檢驗“波特假說”是否存在及存在的條件併確定最優規製水平。結果錶明環境規製對創新的激勵作用具有一定的滯後性，在噹期阻礙技術創新，在滯後期促進創新且在滯後二期促進作用最明顯；環境規製彊度與技術創新之間存在三重門檻效應，規製彊度較低時規製對創新的影響錶現為一種潛動力，不足以引髮創新活動的開展，在最優規製水平顯著促進創新，彊度過高時促進作用減弱。
“파특가설”인위합리설치적배경규제정책재장기능구자격기업진행기술창신，산생창신보상효응，종이미보인규제증가적성본，인차발휘규제적창신효응시실현경제발전여배경보호쌍영적관건。문장운용2000—2010년중국29개지구적면판수거，통과계통GMM화문함회귀방법，재저탄시각하검험“파특가설”시부존재급존재적조건병학정최우규제수평。결과표명배경규제대창신적격려작용구유일정적체후성，재당기조애기술창신，재체후기촉진창신차재체후이기촉진작용최명현；배경규제강도여기술창신지간존재삼중문함효응，규제강도교저시규제대창신적영향표현위일충잠동력，불족이인발창신활동적개전，재최우규제수평현저촉진창신，강도과고시촉진작용감약。
The“porter hypothesis”states that reasonable set of environmental regulation can stimulate enterprise technical innovation in the long term and produce innovation compensation effects, which can compensate for cost of obeying the regula- tion. So realizing the innovation effects of regulation is the key to realize economic development and environmental protection. This paper examines the impact of environmental regulation on enterprises＇ technological innovation in low-carbon perspective using the dynamic panel data for 29 regions in China from 2000 to 2010. In addition, we verify the existence of the “Porter Hypothesis” and the optimal level of regulation. The results show that innovation incentives of environmental regulation have a certain lag period. In the current, they hinder technological innovation, but promote innovation in the lag period, the effects are the most obvious in the lagging period; technological innovation effects of environmental regulations also show differences in the different strength of the regulations, in the lower intensity regulation, impacts on innovation performance of regulation stay as a potential power, which do not strong enough to lead innovative. Regulation will promote innovation in the optimal level of regulation significantly, promotion is weakened when intensity is too high.
