经济评论
經濟評論
경제평론
Economic Review
2013年
4期
151~158
,共null页
内生经济增长理论 企业规模 动态变化 资源再配置 经济增长模型 内生增长理论 宏观经济增长 小规模企业
內生經濟增長理論 企業規模 動態變化 資源再配置 經濟增長模型 內生增長理論 宏觀經濟增長 小規模企業
내생경제증장이론 기업규모 동태변화 자원재배치 경제증장모형 내생증장이론 굉관경제증장 소규모기업
Firm Size Distribution; Firm Growth; Economic Growth
传统的内生经济增长理论通常假定代表性企业,而实际上企业是异质性的,它们的规模分布极不均衡,即大量小规模企业与少量大规模企业并存。近年来,学者们构建了一系列满足企业规模动态特征的经济增长模型,结果表明单个企业创新、知识外溢和异质性企业之间的资源再配置共同推动了经济增长,而传统内生增长理论则忽略了异质企业之间资源再配置的作用。本文根据影响企业规模的因素将文献分为三类,分别为外生冲击和外生技术进步驱动企业规模变化的文献、内生技术创新驱动企业规模变化的文献以及其他因素驱动企业规模变化的文献。这些研究使得从微观企业增长到宏观经济增长之间的联系变得更为清晰,对发展中国家的经济增长具有重要的政策涵义。
傳統的內生經濟增長理論通常假定代錶性企業,而實際上企業是異質性的,它們的規模分佈極不均衡,即大量小規模企業與少量大規模企業併存。近年來,學者們構建瞭一繫列滿足企業規模動態特徵的經濟增長模型,結果錶明單箇企業創新、知識外溢和異質性企業之間的資源再配置共同推動瞭經濟增長,而傳統內生增長理論則忽略瞭異質企業之間資源再配置的作用。本文根據影響企業規模的因素將文獻分為三類,分彆為外生遲擊和外生技術進步驅動企業規模變化的文獻、內生技術創新驅動企業規模變化的文獻以及其他因素驅動企業規模變化的文獻。這些研究使得從微觀企業增長到宏觀經濟增長之間的聯繫變得更為清晰,對髮展中國傢的經濟增長具有重要的政策涵義。
전통적내생경제증장이론통상가정대표성기업,이실제상기업시이질성적,타문적규모분포겁불균형,즉대량소규모기업여소량대규모기업병존。근년래,학자문구건료일계렬만족기업규모동태특정적경제증장모형,결과표명단개기업창신、지식외일화이질성기업지간적자원재배치공동추동료경제증장,이전통내생증장이론칙홀략료이질기업지간자원재배치적작용。본문근거영향기업규모적인소장문헌분위삼류,분별위외생충격화외생기술진보구동기업규모변화적문헌、내생기술창신구동기업규모변화적문헌이급기타인소구동기업규모변화적문헌。저사연구사득종미관기업증장도굉관경제증장지간적련계변득경위청석,대발전중국가적경제증장구유중요적정책함의。
Scholars usually assume there is a representative firm in traditional endogenous growth theory. However, firms are heterogeneous actually. Firm sizes are highly skew that a few large firms coexist with large numbers of small firms. Recently, scholars have constructed a series of economic growth models,which are consistent with empirical characteristics of firm dynamics. Their results show that firm innovation, knowledge spillover and reallocation of resources among heterogeneous firms promote economic growth jointly. However,the role of reallocation of resources among heterogeneous firms is ignored in traditional endogenous growth theory. According to the factors that affect firm scale, these studies can be divided into three categories respectively, literatures in which exogenous shocks and exogenous technological progress drive firm scale to change, literatures in which endogenous technological innovation drive firm scale to change, and literatures in which other factors drive firm scale to change. These researches made the linkages between micro firm growth and macroeconomic growth become more clear, and have important policy implications to the economic growth of developing countries.