山西师大学报:社会科学版
山西師大學報:社會科學版
산서사대학보:사회과학판
Journal of Shanxi Teachers University
2013年
4期
14~17
,共null页
霍克海默 阿多诺 辩证法 比较研究
霍剋海默 阿多諾 辯證法 比較研究
곽극해묵 아다낙 변증법 비교연구
Hocheimer; Adorno ; dialectics ; comparative study
霍克海默与阿多诺都是西方马克思主义代表人物,两人都有着丰富的辩证法思想,前者提出“启蒙辩证法”,意指使人们的思想从迷信、愚昧、盲目崇拜当中解放出来的观念与行为,揭示了思想、观念辩证发展的内在逻辑。后者则主张“否定辩证法”,提出“变化着的实践需要批判的思想”,突出强调辩证法的否定、批判的根本特性。实践和根源于实践基础上形成的思想之间,客体和把握客体的概念之间,概念和概念所表达的事物之间并不是完全同一的,因而要使思想随着变化了的实践而变化,要使概念能够完全表达被表达的事物,就必须要“批判”原有的思想,要“否定”过时了的概念。
霍剋海默與阿多諾都是西方馬剋思主義代錶人物,兩人都有著豐富的辯證法思想,前者提齣“啟矇辯證法”,意指使人們的思想從迷信、愚昧、盲目崇拜噹中解放齣來的觀唸與行為,揭示瞭思想、觀唸辯證髮展的內在邏輯。後者則主張“否定辯證法”,提齣“變化著的實踐需要批判的思想”,突齣彊調辯證法的否定、批判的根本特性。實踐和根源于實踐基礎上形成的思想之間,客體和把握客體的概唸之間,概唸和概唸所錶達的事物之間併不是完全同一的,因而要使思想隨著變化瞭的實踐而變化,要使概唸能夠完全錶達被錶達的事物,就必鬚要“批判”原有的思想,要“否定”過時瞭的概唸。
곽극해묵여아다낙도시서방마극사주의대표인물,량인도유착봉부적변증법사상,전자제출“계몽변증법”,의지사인문적사상종미신、우매、맹목숭배당중해방출래적관념여행위,게시료사상、관념변증발전적내재라집。후자칙주장“부정변증법”,제출“변화착적실천수요비판적사상”,돌출강조변증법적부정、비판적근본특성。실천화근원우실천기출상형성적사상지간,객체화파악객체적개념지간,개념화개념소표체적사물지간병불시완전동일적,인이요사사상수착변화료적실천이변화,요사개념능구완전표체피표체적사물,취필수요“비판”원유적사상,요“부정”과시료적개념。
Hokheimer and Adorno are representatives of Western Marxism and they both have rich dialeitical thinkings. The former has put forward "enlightening dialectics, which is concepts and behaviors to liberate man from superstition, stupidity and blind worship and reveals the inherent logic of dialectical development of ideas and concepts. The latter, on the other hand, has proposed "negative dialiectics", suggesting that "the changing prac- tice needs critical thinking" and emphasizing the negation of dialectics and the basic feature of criticism. Practice and ideas formed on the basis of practice, object and the concept controlling object and concept and the substance expressed by the concept do not necessarily agree with each other. Therefore we must criticise the original thoughts and negate the outdated ideas in order to change the ideas along with the changing practice and to make concept completely express the substance.