CAJ | 학술논문

伴随我国＂小农水＂重点县建设项目的农田水利管理制度协会化改革并未获得一致、高效的预期目标,而是形成实质型WUA、名义型WUA1和名义型WUA2三类农民用水协会,管理制度效率由最高到最低。采用比较制度分析框架,以对公共部门和宗族的激励水平、宗族与公共部门之间治理关系以及用水协会的协调能力为主线,分析用水协会组织形式的形成机理,考察南方四省（区）三类协会的管理制度效率,发现江西以实质型WUA为主、整体效率最高;广东则以名义型WUA2为主、整体效率最低;湖南和广西协会类型多元化、效率一般。
반수아국＂소농수＂중점현건설항목적농전수리관리제도협회화개혁병미획득일치、고효적예기목표,이시형성실질형WUA、명의형WUA1화명의형WUA2삼류농민용수협회,관리제도효솔유최고도최저。채용비교제도분석광가,이대공공부문화종족적격려수평、종족여공공부문지간치리관계이급용수협회적협조능력위주선,분석용수협회조직형식적형성궤리,고찰남방사성（구）삼류협회적관리제도효솔,발현강서이실질형WUA위주、정체효솔최고;엄동칙이명의형WUA2위주、정체효솔최저;호남화엄서협회류형다원화、효솔일반。
Though the construction project of key counties of ＂small-scale irrigation＂ is carried out to reform the irrigation management institution into WUA, it has not achieved the same and high efficiency objective as expected. There are three types of WUA, the virtual WUA, the nominal WUA1 and the nominal WUA2, which have different efficiency from the highest to the lowest. Based on the comparative institutional framework, this article explores the mechanism of these three origination forms through the incentive of public agency and lineage, the governance between them and the coordination of WUA. Afterwards it discusses these three WUA＇s management efficiency of the southern provinces, and it finds out that Jiangxi has main virtual WUAs and total highest efficiency, and that Guangdong has main nominal WUA2s and total lowest efficiency, Hunan and Guangxi have muhi-types of WUAs and less higher efficiency.