CAJ | 학술논문

个人口味谓词句并不描述客观事态，而是反映对事态的主观评判。由此引发的“无错分歧”催生了相对论与语境论之纷争。但无论按照语境论将评判者或其视角作为语境参数纳入语义成分，还是像相对论那样基于“无错分歧”、相对于评价境况评判命题的真值，均无法解决个人口味谓词句难题。而激进恒定论坚持区分语义内容与语用效应，否认此类语句能够表达完整命题，这就为克服“描述性谬误”和“一个句子一个命题错觉”，进而消解个人口味谓词句难题提供了可资探索的路径。
개인구미위사구병불묘술객관사태，이시반영대사태적주관평판。유차인발적“무착분기”최생료상대론여어경론지분쟁。단무론안조어경론장평판자혹기시각작위어경삼수납입어의성분，환시상상대론나양기우“무착분기”、상대우평개경황평판명제적진치，균무법해결개인구미위사구난제。이격진항정론견지구분어의내용여어용효응，부인차류어구능구표체완정명제，저취위극복“묘술성류오”화“일개구자일개명제착각”，진이소해개인구미위사구난제제공료가자탐색적로경。
Instead of describing certain objective state of affairs, sentences containing predicates of personal taste represent subjective judgments of some sort, thus giving rise to the so-called faultless disagreement, which has been causing prolonged disputes between relativism and contextualism. But the puzzle may never be resolved either by incorporating the judge or his/ her perspective into semantic content as contextualism advocates, or by following relativism in relativizing assessment of the truth of proposition to circumstances of evaluation on the basis of faultless disagreement. Radical invariantism, in contrast, in- sists on the distinction between semantic content and pragmatic enrichment, and it denies that this type of sentence expresses full-fledged proposition. In doing so radical invariantism seems to have provided an approach worth exploring further in eradi- cating the ＂descriptive fallacy＂ and the illusion of ＂one sentence one proposition＂ in an attempt to ultimately dispel the puzzle under consideration.