CAJ | 학술논문

马克斯·韦伯将德国式学术生涯比作一场鲁莽的赌博，指出作为筹码的学术自由的重要性；布迪厄则将法国式学术生涯比作一场游戏，强调文化资本在游戏中的关键作用。事实上，无论是学术“赌博”还是“游戏”，其共同特征是拥有相对透明并得到学术共同体认可和遵守的规则。以此作为参照系，中国式学术生涯既非“赌博”亦非“游戏”。唯有通过政府学术治理的“去行政化”与学术共同体的自我变革双效并举，建立符合学术共同体内在逻辑的学术规则，中国学术人方能真正具备参与学术“赌博”或“游戏”的条件。
마극사·위백장덕국식학술생애비작일장로망적도박，지출작위주마적학술자유적중요성；포적액칙장법국식학술생애비작일장유희，강조문화자본재유희중적관건작용。사실상，무론시학술“도박”환시“유희”，기공동특정시옹유상대투명병득도학술공동체인가화준수적규칙。이차작위삼조계，중국식학술생애기비“도박”역비“유희”。유유통과정부학술치리적“거행정화”여학술공동체적자아변혁쌍효병거，건립부합학술공동체내재라집적학술규칙，중국학술인방능진정구비삼여학술“도박”혹“유희”적조건。
Max Weber compared the German-style academic career to a reckless gamble, stressing the importance of academic freedom as a bargaining counter, while Pierre Bourdieu compared the French-style academic career to a game, emphasizing the critical role of cultural capital. In fact, whether a gamble or a game, their common characteristics are some relatively transparent rules recognized and abided by the academic community. In contrast, the Chinese-style academic career is neither a gamble nor a game. Only through the ＂de-administration＂ of government control in the academic field and the self-transformation of academic community to establish legitimate academic rules, can Chinese academic researchers engage in the academic gamble or game per se.