浙江大学学报:人文社会科学版
浙江大學學報:人文社會科學版
절강대학학보:인문사회과학판
Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2013年
4期
104~112
,共null页
职场攻击行为 攻击方 受害方 第三方 触发事件 认知评价 攻击反应 多视角整合研究
職場攻擊行為 攻擊方 受害方 第三方 觸髮事件 認知評價 攻擊反應 多視角整閤研究
직장공격행위 공격방 수해방 제삼방 촉발사건 인지평개 공격반응 다시각정합연구
workplace aggression; the perpetrator party; the victim party; the third party; trigger event; cognitive evaluation; response to aggression; integrated multi-view research
职场攻击行为指个体对组织成员故意实施身体或心理伤害的行为,它与公民道德建设及和谐社会建设相违背。职场攻击行为与反社会行为、越轨行为、社会破坏、不文明行为、职场暴力和辱虐管理等其他伤害行为在概念范围上存在明显区别。职场攻击行为涉及攻击方、受害方和第三方等角色,角色之间既相互联系又相互转化,从不同视角研究职场攻击行为能更系统地反映职场攻击行为的特征。攻击方、受害方和第三方都有可能实施攻击行为,存在相同的触发路径,即触发事件—认知评价—攻击行为。三种角色针对职场攻击行为会作出相应的行为反应,反应类型包括非攻击型行为反应和攻击型行为反应。当受害方和第三方采取攻击型行为反应时,则出现攻击方、受害方和第三方相互攻击的成对结构。职场攻击行为多视角整合模型综合反映了职场攻击行为的触发路径、反应形式和成对结构。
職場攻擊行為指箇體對組織成員故意實施身體或心理傷害的行為,它與公民道德建設及和諧社會建設相違揹。職場攻擊行為與反社會行為、越軌行為、社會破壞、不文明行為、職場暴力和辱虐管理等其他傷害行為在概唸範圍上存在明顯區彆。職場攻擊行為涉及攻擊方、受害方和第三方等角色,角色之間既相互聯繫又相互轉化,從不同視角研究職場攻擊行為能更繫統地反映職場攻擊行為的特徵。攻擊方、受害方和第三方都有可能實施攻擊行為,存在相同的觸髮路徑,即觸髮事件—認知評價—攻擊行為。三種角色針對職場攻擊行為會作齣相應的行為反應,反應類型包括非攻擊型行為反應和攻擊型行為反應。噹受害方和第三方採取攻擊型行為反應時,則齣現攻擊方、受害方和第三方相互攻擊的成對結構。職場攻擊行為多視角整閤模型綜閤反映瞭職場攻擊行為的觸髮路徑、反應形式和成對結構。
직장공격행위지개체대조직성원고의실시신체혹심리상해적행위,타여공민도덕건설급화해사회건설상위배。직장공격행위여반사회행위、월궤행위、사회파배、불문명행위、직장폭력화욕학관리등기타상해행위재개념범위상존재명현구별。직장공격행위섭급공격방、수해방화제삼방등각색,각색지간기상호련계우상호전화,종불동시각연구직장공격행위능경계통지반영직장공격행위적특정。공격방、수해방화제삼방도유가능실시공격행위,존재상동적촉발로경,즉촉발사건—인지평개—공격행위。삼충각색침대직장공격행위회작출상응적행위반응,반응류형포괄비공격형행위반응화공격형행위반응。당수해방화제삼방채취공격형행위반응시,칙출현공격방、수해방화제삼방상호공격적성대결구。직장공격행위다시각정합모형종합반영료직장공격행위적촉발로경、반응형식화성대결구。
Workplace aggression refers to any behavior that is intended to harm an employee psychologically or physically within an organization.It not only damages the health of the victim directly,but also brings negative impact on the individual's work and life indirectly,so it is an important issue in organizational management.In previous studies,scholars focused on influencing factors and outcomes of workplace aggression from different perspectives:the perpetrator,the victim and the third party.However,research on workplace aggression from a single perspective isolates the three parties and consequently overlooks the fact that they are interchangeable.Firstly,this paper defines workplace aggression and distinguishes this notion from antisocial behavior,social undermining,deviant behavior,incivility,workplace violence and abusive supervision.Secondly,it deeply analyzes the triggered path,the response style and the dyadic construct of workplace aggression,based on the perspectives of the perpetrator,the victim and the third party.Lastly,it establishes an integrated model to systematically reflect the dynamic relationship among the three parties.The perpetrator,the victim and the third party are all likely to conduct aggressive behavior.Therefore the triggered path is the same:the triggering event leads to the cognitive evaluation which in turn brings about the aggressive behavior.The aggressive behavior itself may function as the triggering event which may trigger another round of aggressive behavior conducted by the victim or the third party.All of the three parties may address the workplace aggression with same behavioral responses,either aggressive or non-aggressive.When the victim and the third party adopt aggressive behavior response,it will produce the dyadic construct,which involves the three parties attacking each other on a one-to-one basis and can be influenced by both the individual and situational characteristics.The integrated model of workplace aggression not only integrates the triggered path,the response style and the dyadic construct,but also reflects the workplace aggressions'traits as a spiraling cycle.This paper provides a new perspective for the study of workplace aggression.However,there is no quantitative data analysis or case studies presented in this research.A follow-up empirical research on this subject is thus needed.