国际贸易问题
國際貿易問題
국제무역문제
Journal of International Trade
2013年
8期
72~82
,共null页
CAFTA 机电产品 贸易创造 贸易转移 平均处理效应
CAFTA 機電產品 貿易創造 貿易轉移 平均處理效應
CAFTA 궤전산품 무역창조 무역전이 평균처리효응
CAFTA; Machinery and electronic products; Trade creation; Trade diversion; Average treatment effect
本文基于1995—2010年中国机电产品的进口情况,将贸易引力模型和倍差法结合起来,在分别利用Heckman选择模型处理零贸易流和固定效应模型控制国家层面上异质性偏差的基础上,实证分析了CAFTA建立对中国机电产品进口产生的贸易效应。计量结果显示:CAFTA对中国机电产品的进口存在着显著的贸易创造效应,但没有发生贸易转移效应,因而整体上提高了中国的福利水平。更进一步,如果同时考虑选择性偏差和异质性偏差,CAFTA对中国从东盟进口机电产品的影响,也即贸易创造效应为45.94%,而对中国从非东盟成员国进口机电产品的影响,也即贸易转移效应为27.38%。总体而言,CAFTA的建立对中国机电产品进口产生的净效应,即平均处理效应为14.57%,区域内贸易并没有以贸易转移为代价来实现增长。
本文基于1995—2010年中國機電產品的進口情況,將貿易引力模型和倍差法結閤起來,在分彆利用Heckman選擇模型處理零貿易流和固定效應模型控製國傢層麵上異質性偏差的基礎上,實證分析瞭CAFTA建立對中國機電產品進口產生的貿易效應。計量結果顯示:CAFTA對中國機電產品的進口存在著顯著的貿易創造效應,但沒有髮生貿易轉移效應,因而整體上提高瞭中國的福利水平。更進一步,如果同時攷慮選擇性偏差和異質性偏差,CAFTA對中國從東盟進口機電產品的影響,也即貿易創造效應為45.94%,而對中國從非東盟成員國進口機電產品的影響,也即貿易轉移效應為27.38%。總體而言,CAFTA的建立對中國機電產品進口產生的淨效應,即平均處理效應為14.57%,區域內貿易併沒有以貿易轉移為代價來實現增長。
본문기우1995—2010년중국궤전산품적진구정황,장무역인력모형화배차법결합기래,재분별이용Heckman선택모형처리령무역류화고정효응모형공제국가층면상이질성편차적기출상,실증분석료CAFTA건립대중국궤전산품진구산생적무역효응。계량결과현시:CAFTA대중국궤전산품적진구존재착현저적무역창조효응,단몰유발생무역전이효응,인이정체상제고료중국적복이수평。경진일보,여과동시고필선택성편차화이질성편차,CAFTA대중국종동맹진구궤전산품적영향,야즉무역창조효응위45.94%,이대중국종비동맹성원국진구궤전산품적영향,야즉무역전이효응위27.38%。총체이언,CAFTA적건립대중국궤전산품진구산생적정효응,즉평균처리효응위14.57%,구역내무역병몰유이무역전이위대개래실현증장。
Based on China's import of machinery and electronic products over 1995-2010, this paper conducts an empirical investigation into the trade effects of the CAFTA establishment on China's import of machinery and electronic products by combining the trade gravity model with the difference-in-difference method and respectively processing trade zero trade flows with Heckman selection model and fixing national heterogeneity with the fixed effect model. The resuits show that CAFTA has a significant trade creation effect on China's import of machinery and electronic products but has no trade diversion effect, thus improving the overall welfare in China. Moreover, if selection bias and heterogeneity deviation are together considered, the CAFTA would have increased China's import of machinery and electronic products from ASEAN by 45.94% (trade creation effect), while meantime the CAFTA would have increased China's import of machinery and electronic products from non-ASEAN countries by 27.38% (trade diversion effect). On the whole, the average treatment effect of the CAFTA establishment on China's import of machinery and electronic products is 39.65%, suggesting the increase in regional trade is achieved not at the expense of trade diversion.