CAJ | 학술논문

目前的西方研究大都关注特定文化和政治背景下的中国如何看待全球治理问题。这些内容包括：（1）儒家思想中的不干预和自我治理倾向;（2）社会主义中的集体主义道德观强调用说服而不是单边主义来解决世界冲突;（3）源于不发达而产生的劣势损害了自信;（4）二战以来联合国和美国控制主要国际组织的行径令人反感。由此认为,全球治理格局中的中国风格是被动回应的而不是积极主动的,是问题解决导向而不是目标驱动型,全球义务与改革任务更多地聚集于主要大国而不是处于衰退中的国家。也就是说,中国目前仍然主张通过依靠世界主要国家的自主治理模式来树立全球领导力,那种仅仅依靠闭门式的说服行动和反对公开制裁的例证来干预失败或衰退国家的做法是行不通的。
목전적서방연구대도관주특정문화화정치배경하적중국여하간대전구치리문제。저사내용포괄：（1）유가사상중적불간예화자아치리경향;（2）사회주의중적집체주의도덕관강조용설복이불시단변주의래해결세계충돌;（3）원우불발체이산생적열세손해료자신;（4）이전이래연합국화미국공제주요국제조직적행경령인반감。유차인위,전구치리격국중적중국풍격시피동회응적이불시적겁주동적,시문제해결도향이불시목표구동형,전구의무여개혁임무경다지취집우주요대국이불시처우쇠퇴중적국가。야취시설,중국목전잉연주장통과의고세계주요국가적자주치리모식래수립전구령도력,나충부부의고폐문식적설복행동화반대공개제재적예증래간예실패혹쇠퇴국가적주법시행불통적。
The present study traces the cultural and political contexts within which Beijing considers global governance.They include：（1）Confucian dispositions toward non-interventionismand self-governance;（2）the socialist collectivist ethics that stress persuasion instead of unilateralism;（3）a lingering sense of inferiority arising from underdevelopment that harmsself-confidence;and（4）the repugnant experiences with the United Nations（UN）and the United States that have dominated most international organizations since World War II.The consequential Chinese style of global governance is reactive rather than proactive,problemsolving rather than goal-driven,and attentive to obligation and reform more in other major countries than in failing states.That said,China could still assert global leadership by acting as a model of self-governance for other major countries and by intervening in failing states only through closed-door persuasion and exemplification as opposed to open sanctioning.