华中农业大学学报:社会科学版
華中農業大學學報:社會科學版
화중농업대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
2013年
5期
133~139
,共null页
土地征收 制度改革 学术研究 文献计量分析
土地徵收 製度改革 學術研究 文獻計量分析
토지정수 제도개혁 학술연구 문헌계량분석
land expropriation; institution reformation; academic research; biliometric analysis
运用文献计量工具,对CSSCI数据库收录的发表于2000-2012年间的我国征地制度改革相关文献进行分析,揭示这一研究领域的现状与问题。结果显示:征地制度改革研究作者群体庞大,汇集了国内土地管理知名学者;研究机构以国内知名高校为主;相关研究紧跟政策导向,为社会发展和制度改革提供了有力支撑;文献质量较高;相关研究主要有3条路径。关于征地制度改革研究的不足:知识基础略显薄弱;学术结论向公共政策的转化能力不强;研究热点分布不均;研究所属学科和研究方法不均衡。提出我国征地制度改革相关研究在研究方法上的重点:加强部分重点问题的研究;注重从应然向实然转化的研究;注重多学科的结合。
運用文獻計量工具,對CSSCI數據庫收錄的髮錶于2000-2012年間的我國徵地製度改革相關文獻進行分析,揭示這一研究領域的現狀與問題。結果顯示:徵地製度改革研究作者群體龐大,彙集瞭國內土地管理知名學者;研究機構以國內知名高校為主;相關研究緊跟政策導嚮,為社會髮展和製度改革提供瞭有力支撐;文獻質量較高;相關研究主要有3條路徑。關于徵地製度改革研究的不足:知識基礎略顯薄弱;學術結論嚮公共政策的轉化能力不彊;研究熱點分佈不均;研究所屬學科和研究方法不均衡。提齣我國徵地製度改革相關研究在研究方法上的重點:加彊部分重點問題的研究;註重從應然嚮實然轉化的研究;註重多學科的結閤。
운용문헌계량공구,대CSSCI수거고수록적발표우2000-2012년간적아국정지제도개혁상관문헌진행분석,게시저일연구영역적현상여문제。결과현시:정지제도개혁연구작자군체방대,회집료국내토지관리지명학자;연구궤구이국내지명고교위주;상관연구긴근정책도향,위사회발전화제도개혁제공료유력지탱;문헌질량교고;상관연구주요유3조로경。관우정지제도개혁연구적불족:지식기출략현박약;학술결론향공공정책적전화능력불강;연구열점분포불균;연구소속학과화연구방법불균형。제출아국정지제도개혁상관연구재연구방법상적중점:가강부분중점문제적연구;주중종응연향실연전화적연구;주중다학과적결합。
This paper analyzes the academic literatures, which were published from 2000 to 2012 and embodied in CSSCI, on China's land expropriation reform with the help of biliometric tools in order to reveal the status quo and problems of this research field. The result shows that, this research field has attracted most famous professors of land resource management and a large number of researchers~ most institutes are famous universities in China; the annual distribution of literatures suggests that the researches are policy-oriented; all literatures have high quality; these researches could be divided by the keywords into three routes. The land expropriation compensation and resettlement, the urbanization and landless farmers, and rights and processes during the land expropriation. Problems of this research field include, the basic knowledge of this research is weak; the ability to transfer academic results to public policy is not strong and the distribution of research hot points is unbalanced; and the distribution of re- search disciplines and methods is also unbalanced. Therefore, this paper proposes several suggestions, for example, related research about China~s land expropriation reform should focus on the key points in research methodology, research on important problems and the transformation from rational evolution to actuality should be strengthened and finally multidisciplinary integration should be emphasized.