CAJ | 학술논문

大量存在的双边投资条约（Bilateral Investment Treaty,简称BIT）构成了国际投资法的主体,而BIT中的最惠国待遇条款则是保障平等竞争,促进投资自由化的重要工具。目前在国际投资实践中出现了最惠国待遇条款能否适用于争端解决程序的争议,该争议的解决有赖于国际仲裁机构的解释。国际仲裁机构对该问题的解释存在着从宽解释和限制解释的问题,从而造成了最惠国待遇条款在争端解决适用上的不确定性。《维也纳条约法公约》第31、32条构成了条约解释的习惯法规则,按照习惯法规则对最惠国待遇条款进行解释,不仅有助于投资争端解决的一致性和一贯性,也有助于为国际投资体制提供保障和可预见性。
대량존재적쌍변투자조약（Bilateral Investment Treaty,간칭BIT）구성료국제투자법적주체,이BIT중적최혜국대우조관칙시보장평등경쟁,촉진투자자유화적중요공구。목전재국제투자실천중출현료최혜국대우조관능부괄용우쟁단해결정서적쟁의,해쟁의적해결유뢰우국제중재궤구적해석。국제중재궤구대해문제적해석존재착종관해석화한제해석적문제,종이조성료최혜국대우조관재쟁단해결괄용상적불학정성。《유야납조약법공약》제31、32조구성료조약해석적습관법규칙,안조습관법규칙대최혜국대우조관진행해석,불부유조우투자쟁단해결적일치성화일관성,야유조우위국제투자체제제공보장화가예견성。
Bilateral investment treaties have become the main body of the international investment law;the most-favored-nation treatment（MFN） clause of the BIT is an important tool of ensuring fair competition and promoting economic liberalization.At present,the disputes have appeared whether the MFN clause applied to the dispute settlement.To solve the problem,it depends on the interpretation of the international arbitration.But the interpretation of the international arbitrations are different,there are broaden interpretation and limitation interpretation.It leaded to the uncertainty on the question whether the MFN clause applied to the dispute settlement.This text must be interpreted in accordance with the principles of treaty interpretation,as codified in the Vienna Convention.Interpretation of MFN clause according to article 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention will contribute to the consistency of the dispute settlement,and help to provide protection and predictability of the international investment system.