中国行政管理
中國行政管理
중국행정관리
Chinese Public Administration
2013年
8期
112~116
,共null页
抗争政治 利益表达 林权纠纷 碎片化抗争
抗爭政治 利益錶達 林權糾紛 碎片化抗爭
항쟁정치 이익표체 림권규분 쇄편화항쟁
contentious politics, interest expression, the forest property rights disputes, fragmentized struggle
在对学术界近年来有关抗争性政治的研究成果述评的基础上,本文以闽西北J县的林权纠纷为例,认为当前底层农民集体行动的原动力机制、动员结构和组织结构是基于利益表达的“自发性”、和“去政治化”和“弱组织化”的“碎片化抗争”。文章认为,农民分散化、碎片化的利益表达往往达不到或不完全达到其利益诉求。而对农民的抗争性行动处理不当将会导致极端群体性抗争事件。如何吸纳底层农民的政治参与,正确对待其合理诉求,探究社会稳定中的农民利益维护机制,使问题的解决向体制内、可控性和组织化的对话渠道方向倾斜,从而破解“维权”和“维稳”困局,是值得探讨的问题。
在對學術界近年來有關抗爭性政治的研究成果述評的基礎上,本文以閩西北J縣的林權糾紛為例,認為噹前底層農民集體行動的原動力機製、動員結構和組織結構是基于利益錶達的“自髮性”、和“去政治化”和“弱組織化”的“碎片化抗爭”。文章認為,農民分散化、碎片化的利益錶達往往達不到或不完全達到其利益訴求。而對農民的抗爭性行動處理不噹將會導緻極耑群體性抗爭事件。如何吸納底層農民的政治參與,正確對待其閤理訴求,探究社會穩定中的農民利益維護機製,使問題的解決嚮體製內、可控性和組織化的對話渠道方嚮傾斜,從而破解“維權”和“維穩”睏跼,是值得探討的問題。
재대학술계근년래유관항쟁성정치적연구성과술평적기출상,본문이민서북J현적림권규분위례,인위당전저층농민집체행동적원동력궤제、동원결구화조직결구시기우이익표체적“자발성”、화“거정치화”화“약조직화”적“쇄편화항쟁”。문장인위,농민분산화、쇄편화적이익표체왕왕체불도혹불완전체도기이익소구。이대농민적항쟁성행동처리불당장회도치겁단군체성항쟁사건。여하흡납저층농민적정치삼여,정학대대기합리소구,탐구사회은정중적농민이익유호궤제,사문제적해결향체제내、가공성화조직화적대화거도방향경사,종이파해“유권”화“유은”곤국,시치득탐토적문제。
In recent years, the academic circle has got some achievements in contentious politics. On the basis of these a chievements, this paper takes forest property rights disputes of J County in the northwest of Fujian Province as an example and holds the idea that the motive force mechanism, mobilization structure and organization structure of farmers' collective action is a fragmentized struggle of spontaneity, de--politicization and organizational slack based on interest expression. In view of the formation mechanism and operation rules of farmers' collective action, this paper argues that farmers' decentralized and fragmentized expression for interests often can not or will not fully meet its interest demands. Moreover, the inappropriate disposal of farmers' protest will lead to serious group conflicts. So it is worthy of discussion and research in the following questions: how to attract the political participation of bottom farmers, and how to treat the rational appeals correctly. In addition, to explore the interests of farmer maintenance mechanism in a stable society, we can make the solution incline toward the inside--system, controllable and organizable dialogue, and break the dilemma of rights protection and stability maintenance.