CAJ | 학술논문

为探索我国运动员退役安置政策的决策机制,以经典的政策过程理论倡议联盟框架为理论基础,运用文献资料研究、文本分析等方法分析了我国建国以来的运动员退役安置政策,通过数10年来的政策变迁反馈来推导政策决策机制。研究发现,我国运动员退役安置政策变迁中存在＂效率＂与＂公平＂两大倡议联盟,二者在政策的深层核心信念、核心信念、次要方面等层面存在不同程度的一致性与分歧,这种一致性和分歧会因以政策为导向的学习而改变。不同倡议联盟在我国运动员退役安置政策中的主要争议以及以政策为导向的学习主要发生于政策核心信念层面,决定着政策的变迁和决策。
위탐색아국운동원퇴역안치정책적결책궤제,이경전적정책과정이론창의련맹광가위이론기출,운용문헌자료연구、문본분석등방법분석료아국건국이래적운동원퇴역안치정책,통과수10년래적정책변천반궤래추도정책결책궤제。연구발현,아국운동원퇴역안치정책변천중존재＂효솔＂여＂공평＂량대창의련맹,이자재정책적심층핵심신념、핵심신념、차요방면등층면존재불동정도적일치성여분기,저충일치성화분기회인이정책위도향적학습이개변。불동창의련맹재아국운동원퇴역안치정책중적주요쟁의이급이정책위도향적학습주요발생우정책핵심신념층면,결정착정책적변천화결책。
To explore the decision-making mechanism of resettlement policy for retired athletes in China,this paper based on the theory the Advocacy Coalition Framework（ACF）,using literature,textual analysis and other methods analyzed the resettlement policy for retired athletes since the founding of our country,to deduce the policy decision-making mechanism through the feedback of decades of policy change.Study found that there exists ＂efficiency＂ and ＂fairness＂ two advocacy coalitions in the change of resettlement policy for retired athletes in China.They have different degrees of consistency and differences on the deep core beliefs,core beliefs and secondary aspect of the policy,and the consistency and differences will change as the policy-oriented learning occurred.The controversy and policy-oriented learning of the policy in different advocacy coalition is mainly presented at the level of core beliefs of the policy,and it determines the policy change and decision-making.