CAJ | 학술논문

《红楼梦评论》和《人间词话》作为王国维学术生涯中的两个经典学术文本却存在着两种截然不同的学术境遇：前者因“以西套中”、牵强附会而遭人诟病，后者因“以中化西”、融通创新而为世人赞赏。这是它们“以西套中”和“以中化西”两种不同的言说方式造成的。以王国维前后期不同哲学思想的形成和架构为切入点方能深入探求上述两种言说方式差异形成的根本原因，这对当今中国学术界特别是当今中国文论的现代性转换亦能提供一些有益的启示和可资借鉴的经验。
《홍루몽평론》화《인간사화》작위왕국유학술생애중적량개경전학술문본각존재착량충절연불동적학술경우：전자인“이서투중”、견강부회이조인후병，후자인“이중화서”、융통창신이위세인찬상。저시타문“이서투중”화“이중화서”량충불동적언설방식조성적。이왕국유전후기불동철학사상적형성화가구위절입점방능심입탐구상술량충언설방식차이형성적근본원인，저대당금중국학술계특별시당금중국문론적현대성전환역능제공일사유익적계시화가자차감적경험。
Comments on ＂A Dream of Red Mansions＂ and Jen-Chien Tz＇u-hua have two different academ- ic confrontment completely as the two classic academic texts in Wang Kuo-wei＇ s academic career. The former was blamed for its ＂Western culture suiting China＂ and farfetched （irrelevant） comparison but the latter was highly praised for its ＂China＇ s digestive absorption of Western culture＂ and innovation, which resulted from the different mode of discourse that ＂Western culture suiting China＂ and ＂China＇ s digestive absorption of Western culture＂. Only through Wang Kuo-wei＇ s formation and constructure of different philosophical thought in his earlier and later period can We explore the fundamental reason of the two different mode of discourse coming into being profoundly, which can provide some useful enlightenment and advisable experience for the current Chinese academic circles especially for the modern transformation of today＇s Chinese Literary Theory.