经济社会体制比较
經濟社會體製比較
경제사회체제비교
Comparative Economic and Social Systems
2013年
4期
94~108
,共null页
黄大志 亚得列·雅蒲 张占力(译)
黃大誌 亞得列·雅蒲 張佔力(譯)
황대지 아득렬·아포 장점력(역)
住房 住房购买力 住房需求 新加坡
住房 住房購買力 住房需求 新加坡
주방 주방구매력 주방수구 신가파
Housing; Housing Affordability; Housing Aspirations; Singapore
住房能够满足人们多种层次的需求,是促进家庭流动的社会表征之一。此外,住房也能够检验新加坡提供基本福利物品,以及应对不断壮大的中产阶级日益摒弃公共住房这一批量化生产的消费品、追求更高居住品质时的管控能力。高端私人住房需求已经影响到了新加坡的发展轨迹,此种需求能否得到满足甚至成为获取中产阶级持续政治支持的谈判筹码。为了证实渴望获得私人住房的房屋所有者的一般态度,作者进行了问卷调查。文章讨论了1960年后新加坡住房政策背后的基本原理,尤其是深入探究了为何有效的公共住房提升要与质量更好、社会地位更高的私人住房相结合,即便国家为改善公共住房质量做出了不懈努力之后依然如此。20世纪90年代早期的住房价格螺旋上升使许多人失去了住房购买力。制定未来规划以满足人们对私人住房的偏好与需求时,也不得不面对许多困难,诸如高房价、土地有限且固定、竞相使用中央公积金(Central Provident Fund)作为购房主要融资来源等等。或许更为可行的方法是缩小公共住房和私人住房在土地使用期限等方面的差距,目前政府也在着手研究这一办法。
住房能夠滿足人們多種層次的需求,是促進傢庭流動的社會錶徵之一。此外,住房也能夠檢驗新加坡提供基本福利物品,以及應對不斷壯大的中產階級日益摒棄公共住房這一批量化生產的消費品、追求更高居住品質時的管控能力。高耑私人住房需求已經影響到瞭新加坡的髮展軌跡,此種需求能否得到滿足甚至成為穫取中產階級持續政治支持的談判籌碼。為瞭證實渴望穫得私人住房的房屋所有者的一般態度,作者進行瞭問捲調查。文章討論瞭1960年後新加坡住房政策揹後的基本原理,尤其是深入探究瞭為何有效的公共住房提升要與質量更好、社會地位更高的私人住房相結閤,即便國傢為改善公共住房質量做齣瞭不懈努力之後依然如此。20世紀90年代早期的住房價格螺鏇上升使許多人失去瞭住房購買力。製定未來規劃以滿足人們對私人住房的偏好與需求時,也不得不麵對許多睏難,諸如高房價、土地有限且固定、競相使用中央公積金(Central Provident Fund)作為購房主要融資來源等等。或許更為可行的方法是縮小公共住房和私人住房在土地使用期限等方麵的差距,目前政府也在著手研究這一辦法。
주방능구만족인문다충층차적수구,시촉진가정류동적사회표정지일。차외,주방야능구검험신가파제공기본복리물품,이급응대불단장대적중산계급일익병기공공주방저일비양화생산적소비품、추구경고거주품질시적관공능력。고단사인주방수구이경영향도료신가파적발전궤적,차충수구능부득도만족심지성위획취중산계급지속정치지지적담판주마。위료증실갈망획득사인주방적방옥소유자적일반태도,작자진행료문권조사。문장토론료1960년후신가파주방정책배후적기본원리,우기시심입탐구료위하유효적공공주방제승요여질량경호、사회지위경고적사인주방상결합,즉편국가위개선공공주방질량주출료불해노력지후의연여차。20세기90년대조기적주방개격라선상승사허다인실거료주방구매력。제정미래규화이만족인문대사인주방적편호여수구시,야불득불면대허다곤난,제여고방개、토지유한차고정、경상사용중앙공적금(Central Provident Fund)작위구방주요융자래원등등。혹허경위가행적방법시축소공공주방화사인주방재토지사용기한등방면적차거,목전정부야재착수연구저일판법。
Housing can meet people's needs on a variety of levels and is a social representation that motivates household mobility. Housing also tests the state's ability to manage basic welfare provision as well as aspirations for improved quality and status as the middle class rises in numbers and increasingly rejects public housing as a mass-produced consumer good. This demand for higher-end private housing has exerted pressure on the developmental path of Singapore,and meeting this demand has become a bargaining chip for the continued political support of the middle class. A questionnaire survey was conducted which confirmed the general attitude of housing owners who aspire to obtain private housing. The paper discusses the rationale underlying Singapore's housing policy since 1960. It investigates specifically why effective public housing promotion has to be combined with private housing,perceived as better in quality and higher in status,despite continued state efforts to upgrade public housing quality. A price spiral in the early 1990s has,however,made housing unaffordable for many. Future plans to satisfy aspirations and demand for private housing face difficulties such as high prices,a small and fixed land supply,and competition to use the Central Provident Fund as a chief financing source. A more viable way,perhaps,is to narrow the gap,including in tenure rights,between public and private housing. This is currently being studied by the government.