生态经济
生態經濟
생태경제
Ecological Economy
2013年
8期
69~72
,共null页
廖显春 耿伟 何友均 张德成 李智勇
廖顯春 耿偉 何友均 張德成 李智勇
료현춘 경위 하우균 장덕성 리지용
林业生态建设 林农户 生态补贴 意愿调查
林業生態建設 林農戶 生態補貼 意願調查
임업생태건설 임농호 생태보첩 의원조사
forestry ecological construction; forestry household survey; ecological compensation; willingness to accept
中国长期以来从事林业生态建设工程,如天然林保护工程和退耕还林工程。然而,中国的环境问题如生物多样性丧失、水土流失、沙漠化进一步恶化。该研究目的旨在从林农户视角调查林业生态建设的社会经济驱动力,基于对171林农户的调研,采用多变量回归模型,对其愿意接受补贴,从事生态环境生产进行分析。结果表明,94%的林农户愿意接受补贴,从事生态环境生产。但是,补贴高达每年每公顷6033元。计量结果进一步揭示,受教育程度越高、距离城市越远、农业收入较高,其索要的生态补贴就越高。与此相反,部分在自己地上劳作的农户和农地面积较大的农户,其索要的生态补贴就较低。
中國長期以來從事林業生態建設工程,如天然林保護工程和退耕還林工程。然而,中國的環境問題如生物多樣性喪失、水土流失、沙漠化進一步噁化。該研究目的旨在從林農戶視角調查林業生態建設的社會經濟驅動力,基于對171林農戶的調研,採用多變量迴歸模型,對其願意接受補貼,從事生態環境生產進行分析。結果錶明,94%的林農戶願意接受補貼,從事生態環境生產。但是,補貼高達每年每公頃6033元。計量結果進一步揭示,受教育程度越高、距離城市越遠、農業收入較高,其索要的生態補貼就越高。與此相反,部分在自己地上勞作的農戶和農地麵積較大的農戶,其索要的生態補貼就較低。
중국장기이래종사임업생태건설공정,여천연림보호공정화퇴경환림공정。연이,중국적배경문제여생물다양성상실、수토류실、사막화진일보악화。해연구목적지재종임농호시각조사임업생태건설적사회경제구동력,기우대171임농호적조연,채용다변량회귀모형,대기원의접수보첩,종사생태배경생산진행분석。결과표명,94%적임농호원의접수보첩,종사생태배경생산。단시,보첩고체매년매공경6033원。계량결과진일보게시,수교육정도월고、거리성시월원、농업수입교고,기색요적생태보첩취월고。여차상반,부분재자기지상노작적농호화농지면적교대적농호,기색요적생태보첩취교저。
China has been engaging in one of the world’s largest ecological conservation programs,the Slope Land Conversion Program(SLCP),in order to improve its vulnerable environmental conditions.The SLCP is also called the grain-for-green policy.While the SLCP has drawn broad attention,little has been done to investigate households’ incentives for environmental protection.This study is intended to identify farmers’ willingness to accept compensation for China’s incentive-based programs(CIP),while designing policies to facilitate the implementation of the CIP to replace the Sloping Land Conversion Program(SLCP).With the surveys of 171 households,a multivariate regression model was used to conduct empirical analysis for willingness to accept(WTA).The results show that more than 94% of farmers are willing to accept compensation to engaging in ecological restoring production with more than 6033 Yuan per hectare.Farmers with high education,long distance to city,and more income from farmland have relatively high opportunity costs so that they are not willing to conduct the production of multiple-use forest.In contrast,households farming on their own land and having large land area have relatively low opportunity costs so that they are not willing to provide ecological service.This study not only benefits China’s sustainable development,but also provides insights into other developing countries.