CAJ | 학술논문

依据Kayne提出的“线性对应定理”，一个词项与其“拷贝”不能同时在音系式上获得语音实现，否则表达式会因无法进行线性排列而崩溃失败。但汉语重动句似乎对此要求构成反例，其重复的两个动词均得到语音实现。据此，本文深入探讨了重动句的生成机制及其与“线性对应定理”的关系。本研究表明，重动句的形成是动词拷贝的结果，两个相同的动词之所以均能获得语音实现，是因为前一个动词与其宾语在句法推导后送往音系式的过程中发生了词项融合，该动词不再作为独立词项参与线性排列，保证了重动句成为合法的音系表达式。
의거Kayne제출적“선성대응정리”，일개사항여기“고패”불능동시재음계식상획득어음실현，부칙표체식회인무법진행선성배렬이붕궤실패。단한어중동구사호대차요구구성반례，기중복적량개동사균득도어음실현。거차，본문심입탐토료중동구적생성궤제급기여“선성대응정리”적관계。본연구표명，중동구적형성시동사고패적결과，량개상동적동사지소이균능획득어음실현，시인위전일개동사여기빈어재구법추도후송왕음계식적과정중발생료사항융합，해동사불재작위독립사항삼여선성배렬，보증료중동구성위합법적음계표체식。
According to the Linear Correspondence Axiom （LCA） proposed by Kayne , a lexical item and its copy can＇ t be both phonetically realized, otherwise the derivation will crash at PF because it can＇ t be linearized. The double-verb construction in Mandarin, however, apparently violates such a requirement since it has two and the same verbs phonetically realized. So this paper will probe into its derivation and its （in） conformity to LCA. Our conclusion is that the double-verb construction derives from copying verbs, and the reason why both of the verbs can have phonetical realization is that the first verb and its object have undergone morphological fusion before LCA applies so that its internal structure is invisible. Hence its conformity to the general principle of Universal Grammar.