生态经济
生態經濟
생태경제
Ecological Economy
2013年
9期
67~71
,共null页
国际环境政治 联合国森林论坛 森林文书 建议
國際環境政治 聯閤國森林論罈 森林文書 建議
국제배경정치 연합국삼림론단 삼림문서 건의
international environments and politics; UNFF; international instrument on forests; policy recommendation
以国际森林政策对话机制为研究对象,分析了国际森林问题的内涵和特点,存在的分歧和分歧的实质。国际森林问题分为森林本身问题、森林相关的环境问题和社会问题、导致森林本身问题的成因及解决问题的办法四个层次,超越了森林经营和林业行业,并将国际和国内林业政策对话有机结合起来。国际社会在森林本身存在的问题上有较多的共识,然而发展中国家和发达国家在对问题成因的认知上分歧很大,而就主权、资金援助和技术转让等解决森林问题的手段等分歧更加明显。其分歧体现了参与各方的立场、视角和利益,客观反映了当下尚不具备达成全球法律约束力森林公约的条件。
以國際森林政策對話機製為研究對象,分析瞭國際森林問題的內涵和特點,存在的分歧和分歧的實質。國際森林問題分為森林本身問題、森林相關的環境問題和社會問題、導緻森林本身問題的成因及解決問題的辦法四箇層次,超越瞭森林經營和林業行業,併將國際和國內林業政策對話有機結閤起來。國際社會在森林本身存在的問題上有較多的共識,然而髮展中國傢和髮達國傢在對問題成因的認知上分歧很大,而就主權、資金援助和技術轉讓等解決森林問題的手段等分歧更加明顯。其分歧體現瞭參與各方的立場、視角和利益,客觀反映瞭噹下尚不具備達成全毬法律約束力森林公約的條件。
이국제삼림정책대화궤제위연구대상,분석료국제삼림문제적내함화특점,존재적분기화분기적실질。국제삼림문제분위삼림본신문제、삼림상관적배경문제화사회문제、도치삼림본신문제적성인급해결문제적판법사개층차,초월료삼림경영화임업행업,병장국제화국내임업정책대화유궤결합기래。국제사회재삼림본신존재적문제상유교다적공식,연이발전중국가화발체국가재대문제성인적인지상분기흔대,이취주권、자금원조화기술전양등해결삼림문제적수단등분기경가명현。기분기체현료삼여각방적립장、시각화이익,객관반영료당하상불구비체성전구법률약속력삼림공약적조건。
The manuscript describes connotations and features of international forest issues are documented, analyzed the differentiations on various themes, general causes, and primary root causes of international forest issues between developing countries and developed countries in specific and among developing countries and developed countries in general. The issues of international forest can be categories in 4 levels, including, issues of global forests it, environmental and social issues related to the loss of forests, root causes, and countermeasures to overcome the forest issues. The natures of international forest issues have been beyond forest and forestry itself with integrating of international and national forest policy dialogues. In general, consensuses on global forests have been in place, and disputes on the causes, and countermeasures such as financial support, technology transfer has not yet been narrowed down. The nature of international forest issues reflect the actual position, perspective and desire of the majority in the international community, reflecting that international legal binding instruments on forests has not yet been prepared at this stage.