CAJ | 학술논문

内容提要：美国近期“MicrosoftCorp．v．MotorolaInc．”一案地区法院的判决为标准化组织的合理无歧视许可原则下许可费的计算提供了有益参考。“合理无歧视”许可是标准化组织与参与标准制定者之间的合约，因此应在理解合理无歧视许可背景的基础上，依照合同目的来解释“合理”与“无歧视”的具体含义，并以此作为计算合理无歧视许可费的基本原则。在符合合同目的这一原则下，合适的合理无歧视许可费计算方法应有利于建立先进标准以及促进标准的推广，专利本身对标准及标准实施者产品的价值贡献是决定许可费的关键因素，可以采用“基础许可费＋调整”的方法计算许可费。
내용제요：미국근기“MicrosoftCorp．v．MotorolaInc．”일안지구법원적판결위표준화조직적합리무기시허가원칙하허가비적계산제공료유익삼고。“합리무기시”허가시표준화조직여삼여표준제정자지간적합약，인차응재리해합리무기시허가배경적기출상，의조합동목적래해석“합리”여“무기시”적구체함의，병이차작위계산합리무기시허가비적기본원칙。재부합합동목적저일원칙하，합괄적합리무기시허가비계산방법응유리우건립선진표준이급촉진표준적추엄，전리본신대표준급표준실시자산품적개치공헌시결정허가비적관건인소，가이채용“기출허가비＋조정”적방법계산허가비。
The recent U.S. district court＇s judgment of the ＂Microsoft Corp. V. Motorola Inc.＂ case provides a useful reference for the licensing fee calculation under the Standard-Setting Organizations＇（SSO） reasonable and nondiscriminatory （RAND） rule. RAND licensing commitments create enforceable contracts between SSOs and the respective members. The specific meaning of ＂reasonable＂ and ＂nondiscriminatory＂ should therefore be explained based on the purpose of the contract, and this should be the basic principle of RAND licensing fee calculation. To meet the requirements of the contract purpose, the proper range of RAND licensing fees should be able to help build advanced standards and promote their application. The value and contribution of the patent itself should be the key factor when determining RAND licensing fees, and the ＂basic licensing fee ＋ adjustment＂ method could be used to calculate licensing fees.