CAJ | 학술논문

建构主义何以为推进公共组织的研究提供有益的价值？为回应该问题，本文阐释了公共组织研究从传统路径转向建构主义路径的哲学基础，并以“组织行动的网络”、“意义建构的过程”以及“知识创造的螺线”三个重要概念为线索，分析了建构主义组织研究的基本路径。可以发现，组织研究的建构主义路径采取了与主流实证主义研究不同的理论假设和研究方法。虽然建构主义反对结构功能主义的组织观，诠释了一种更强调平等话语权和价值多样性的哲学理想，但是建构主义研宄者的关键任务并不在于解构和批判，而在于解释和理解组织行动的实践逻辑。在澄清对建构主义的误解的基础上，如若能够采用更为科学和多样化的研究方法以加强经验研究，建构主义就很有可能为国内公共组织研究、乃至公共行政研究做出实质意义上的贡献。
건구주의하이위추진공공조직적연구제공유익적개치？위회응해문제，본문천석료공공조직연구종전통로경전향건구주의로경적철학기출，병이“조직행동적망락”、“의의건구적과정”이급“지식창조적라선”삼개중요개념위선색，분석료건구주의조직연구적기본로경。가이발현，조직연구적건구주의로경채취료여주류실증주의연구불동적이론가설화연구방법。수연건구주의반대결구공능주의적조직관，전석료일충경강조평등화어권화개치다양성적철학이상，단시건구주의연궤자적관건임무병불재우해구화비판，이재우해석화리해조직행동적실천라집。재징청대건구주의적오해적기출상，여약능구채용경위과학화다양화적연구방법이가강경험연구，건구주의취흔유가능위국내공공조직연구、내지공공행정연구주출실질의의상적공헌。
How could researchers improve public organization studies by using the approach of constructivism？ To answer the question, this paper expounds the change of philosophical and methodological foundation of organization studies, and analyzes constructivism approach of organization studies by using three essential concepts as links：＂action nets of or- ganizing＂, ＂process of sensemaking＂ and ＂spiral of knowledge creating＂. The results show that theoretical hypothesis and research methods are different between constructivism approach and positivism approach. And supporters of con-structivism oppose viewpoints of structural functionalism and advocate a philosophical ideal of equality of discourse power and pluralism of value. Even so, the key task of constructivists is not ＂deconstructing＂ or ＂criticizing＂, but to interpret and understand the practical logic of organizing. If domestic researchers use more scientific and diverse meth-ods to promote empirical study on the basis of clarified misunderstandings of constructivism, it could be more possible that constructivism make contributions to study of public organization and public administration.