CAJ | 학술논문

结构-功能和过程-事件是能动司法研究中的两种基本视角。其中,结构-功能视角在社会层面凸显了司法与社会的关联,强调能动司法是对社会需要的回应,从而构成社会塑造的产物;而过程-事件视角则在国家层面将能动司法作为一种治理技术和策略,从而推进了国家的治理。这两种视角共同存在的问题是忽视了司法本身的合法性问题,因此基于合法性视角的思考或许有助于能动司法研究的进一步拓展和深入。
결구-공능화과정-사건시능동사법연구중적량충기본시각。기중,결구-공능시각재사회층면철현료사법여사회적관련,강조능동사법시대사회수요적회응,종이구성사회소조적산물;이과정-사건시각칙재국가층면장능동사법작위일충치리기술화책략,종이추진료국가적치리。저량충시각공동존재적문제시홀시료사법본신적합법성문제,인차기우합법성시각적사고혹허유조우능동사법연구적진일보탁전화심입。
Structure-function and process-event are two basic perspectives in the study of judicial activism, among which structure-function perspective highlights the relevance between judicature and society at the social level and emphasizes that judicial activism is a response to the social needs,which forms a product shaped by society while process-event perspective views the judicial activism as a governing technology and a strategy at the national level,which can propel the gov- ernance of a state. But both of them ignore the issue of legitimacy of judicature itself. As a result, the thinking on the basis of legitimacy may contribute to the further development and deepening of judicial activism researches.