衡阳师范学院学报
衡暘師範學院學報
형양사범학원학보
journal of Hengyang Normal University
2013年
4期
32~37
,共null页
经验论 唯理论 感性理性 反思
經驗論 唯理論 感性理性 反思
경험론 유이론 감성이성 반사
empiricism; rationalism; perceptual and rational; reflection
通过对培根到霍布斯哲学发展的分析，可以看出，经验论走向瓦解，是因为对感性和理性的割裂。这种割裂，首先不是因为他们不重视理性，而是因为他们没有认识到：感性本身就包含反思，包含了要上升到理性的趋势和可能。这也就较好地解释了为什么在霍布斯那里，彻底经验论的出发点反而导致了唯理论和不可知论两种互相矛盾的理论结局。
通過對培根到霍佈斯哲學髮展的分析，可以看齣，經驗論走嚮瓦解，是因為對感性和理性的割裂。這種割裂，首先不是因為他們不重視理性，而是因為他們沒有認識到：感性本身就包含反思，包含瞭要上升到理性的趨勢和可能。這也就較好地解釋瞭為什麽在霍佈斯那裏，徹底經驗論的齣髮點反而導緻瞭唯理論和不可知論兩種互相矛盾的理論結跼。
통과대배근도곽포사철학발전적분석，가이간출，경험론주향와해，시인위대감성화이성적할렬。저충할렬，수선불시인위타문불중시이성，이시인위타문몰유인식도：감성본신취포함반사，포함료요상승도이성적추세화가능。저야취교호지해석료위십요재곽포사나리，철저경험론적출발점반이도치료유이론화불가지론량충호상모순적이론결국。
Through the analysis of the development of philosophy from Bacon to Hobbes, we can see that the empiricism moves forward to collapse because of the disseverance of the perceptual and the rational. This disseverance, first, is not because they did not attach importance to the rational, but because they did not recognize that the sensibility itself contains reflections and the trend to rise to rational and possibility. This has better explained how the starting point for the complete empiricism led Hobbes to rationalism and agnosticism, two contradictory theories.
