CAJ | 학술논문

英帝国的政治治理充分体现了实用主义传统，在不同历史时期针对不同类型殖民地通过不同的方式实施政治治理，形成各具特色的差异化治理模式：即在爱尔兰的由政府引领、商界支持和民众参与的垦殖模式；在东印度的由政府特许、殖民公司运作的公司模式；在北美的由探险家、民众、公司和业主发起、得到政府支持的移民模式和在非洲由国家（英国政府）全程掌控对殖民地的争夺、取得和治理的国家模式。英帝国的差异性治理的特点是：宗主国与殖民地的治理制度不同；四种类型殖民地的治理方式不同；英帝国对属地实行分权制的具体形式不同，同时治理效应也不尽相同。
영제국적정치치리충분체현료실용주의전통，재불동역사시기침대불동류형식민지통과불동적방식실시정치치리，형성각구특색적차이화치리모식：즉재애이란적유정부인령、상계지지화민음삼여적은식모식；재동인도적유정부특허、식민공사운작적공사모식；재북미적유탐험가、민음、공사화업주발기、득도정부지지적이민모식화재비주유국가（영국정부）전정장공대식민지적쟁탈、취득화치리적국가모식。영제국적차이성치리적특점시：종주국여식민지적치리제도불동；사충류형식민지적치리방식불동；영제국대속지실행분권제적구체형식불동，동시치리효응야불진상동。
The political governance of the British Empire fully reflected its tradition of pragmatism, while in different historical periods, the British government implemented the political governance in different ways in different types of colonies, thereby formulated differentiated governance modes with their own characteristics： the plantation mode in Ireland, led by the British Government, supported by the business community and participated by the public; the company mode in East India, chartered by the government, operated by the East India Company; the immigration mode in North America, initiated by the explorers, the public, compa- nies and proprietors, supported by the government; the state mode in Africa, dominated by the state （British government） through its control of the fight for colonial conquest, acquisition and administration. The differen- tiated political governance of the British Empire was characterized by the followings： the governance systems in the suzerain and colonies were different; the governance patterns in three types of colonies were different; the decentralization processes carried out in different parts of the British Empire were different; and finally, the governance effects in those colonized territories are not the same as well.