CAJ | 학술논문

中国和俄国两国均将赃物犯罪集中于刑法典规制且适时变更立法，但罪名在各自刑法典体系中的归属不同。在“上游犯罪”的范围问题上，两国的意见不完全一致。两国对作为犯罪赃物的财物的理解存有一致。两国刑法典均以列举的方式列出了赃物犯罪的行为方式，只是我国刑法典的列举较为详尽。双方均认为自然人可以犯罪，但俄方否定单位可以成立犯罪。俄罗斯加重责任的主体规定更为合理。双方在间接故意能否构成犯罪上主张不尽相同。在赃物犯罪既遂标准上，中国刑法对赃物犯罪的行为方式的细致化的规定更有利于对赃物犯罪既遂的认定。俄方刑法典量刑条件具体化、刑种多样化、处罚人道化的做法值得参考。
중국화아국량국균장장물범죄집중우형법전규제차괄시변경입법，단죄명재각자형법전체계중적귀속불동。재“상유범죄”적범위문제상，량국적의견불완전일치。량국대작위범죄장물적재물적리해존유일치。량국형법전균이열거적방식렬출료장물범죄적행위방식，지시아국형법전적열거교위상진。쌍방균인위자연인가이범죄，단아방부정단위가이성립범죄。아라사가중책임적주체규정경위합리。쌍방재간접고의능부구성범죄상주장불진상동。재장물범죄기수표준상，중국형법대장물범죄적행위방식적세치화적규정경유리우대장물범죄기수적인정。아방형법전양형조건구체화、형충다양화、처벌인도화적주법치득삼고。
Through the comparison of booty crimes in Chinese and Russian criminal laws,it is known that： both countries focus booty crimes on regulation in the penal code and change the legislation timely,but the charges belong to different parts in the system of penal codes. The provisions about the object of crime differ between the two countries. In comparison,our country＇s law is worth using for reference. On the problem about the scope of ＂upstream crimes＂ , the two countries don~t fully agree. The two countries~ understanding of the property for booty is consistent. The penal codes of the two countries list the behavioral patterns of booty crimes in the form of list,but the list of our penal code is more detailed. Both sides think a natural person can commit booty crimes but Russia denies a unit can commit booty crimes. Russia ~s regulation for in- creased responsibility of subject is more reasonable. On the problem that indirect intent can constitute booty crimes or not, both sides~ claims are not completely the same. On the standard of the completion of booty crimes, the detailed rules for booty crime behavior in China＇s criminal law is more advantageous to the acknowledgment about the completion of booty crimes. The Russian approach about the materialization of sentencing conditions, diversification of mitigation and humanitarian punishment, is worthy of reference.