重庆大学学报:社会科学版
重慶大學學報:社會科學版
중경대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Sciences Edition)
2013年
5期
166~172
,共null页
教育层次 经济增长 产出弹性 面板模型
教育層次 經濟增長 產齣彈性 麵闆模型
교육층차 경제증장 산출탄성 면판모형
different levels of education; economic development; output flexibility; panel model
在柯布-道格拉斯生产函数基础上改进建立不同教育层次的生产函数,基于2000—2011年分地区的面板数据,计算分析了初等教育、中等教育和高等教育劳动力对中国经济增长的贡献。结果表明:全国中等教育对经济增长影响最为显著,高等教育次之,初等教育最小,而各层次教育表现出明显的区域差异,一是东中部地区各层次教育对经济增长明显,而西部最弱;二是东部地区高等教育对经济影响最大,中等教育次之,初等教育最小;中部地区中等教育对经济影响最大,高等教育次之,初等教育最小,而西部初等教育对经济增长影响最大,中等教育次之,高等教育最小。因此,中国东中西部地区要采取不同的针对性教育发展政策,提高各地区教育对经济发展的贡献。
在柯佈-道格拉斯生產函數基礎上改進建立不同教育層次的生產函數,基于2000—2011年分地區的麵闆數據,計算分析瞭初等教育、中等教育和高等教育勞動力對中國經濟增長的貢獻。結果錶明:全國中等教育對經濟增長影響最為顯著,高等教育次之,初等教育最小,而各層次教育錶現齣明顯的區域差異,一是東中部地區各層次教育對經濟增長明顯,而西部最弱;二是東部地區高等教育對經濟影響最大,中等教育次之,初等教育最小;中部地區中等教育對經濟影響最大,高等教育次之,初等教育最小,而西部初等教育對經濟增長影響最大,中等教育次之,高等教育最小。因此,中國東中西部地區要採取不同的針對性教育髮展政策,提高各地區教育對經濟髮展的貢獻。
재가포-도격랍사생산함수기출상개진건립불동교육층차적생산함수,기우2000—2011년분지구적면판수거,계산분석료초등교육、중등교육화고등교육노동력대중국경제증장적공헌。결과표명:전국중등교육대경제증장영향최위현저,고등교육차지,초등교육최소,이각층차교육표현출명현적구역차이,일시동중부지구각층차교육대경제증장명현,이서부최약;이시동부지구고등교육대경제영향최대,중등교육차지,초등교육최소;중부지구중등교육대경제영향최대,고등교육차지,초등교육최소,이서부초등교육대경제증장영향최대,중등교육차지,고등교육최소。인차,중국동중서부지구요채취불동적침대성교육발전정책,제고각지구교육대경제발전적공헌。
Different levels of education production function is established by improving Cobb - Douglas production function. Based on the 2000 - 2011 panel data, we calculate and analyze the contribution of primary education, secondary education and higher education labor to economic growth of China. The main conclusions are as follows: the country's secondary education has the most significant impact on economic growth, secondary in higher education and lowest in primary education in the whole country, different levels of education show distinct local diversity: firstly eastern and central regions at all levels of education have obvious impact on economic growth, while the western is the weakest; secondly higher education has the greatest impact on the economy growth, secondary in secondary education and lowest in primary education in the eastern regions; secondary education has the greatest impact on the economy growth, secondary in higher education and lowest in primary education in the central regions, while primary education has the greatest impact on the economy growth, secondary in secondary education and lowest in higher education a in the western region. Therefore, all areas should take different targeted education policy to im- prove the regional contribution of education to economic development.