北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版
北京大學學報:哲學社會科學版
북경대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Peking University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2013年
5期
123~133
,共null页
中国古典修辞学 全球修辞 孔子 人生永恒 社会秩序
中國古典脩辭學 全毬脩辭 孔子 人生永恆 社會秩序
중국고전수사학 전구수사 공자 인생영항 사회질서
Chinese classical rhetoric, global rhetoric, Confucius, eternity of life, social order
中国古代有没有修辞学思想?20世纪70年代,有西方学者提出:“东方或中东没有修辞学”。如今这种观点有所改变吗?应从技术还是哲理层面来发掘中国的古典修辞学思想?套用单一文化背景下的西方古典论辩模式,还是立足多元文化背景和全球视角呢?这是一直困扰东西方学者的一个文化命题。本文从多元文化和全球视角,“对话”中国古代先哲:孔子、鬼谷子、韩非子、叔孙豹和主父偃,以期彰显中国古典修辞思想文化的博大精深。本文回答了以下问题:中国古代有修辞学吗?“西方之外无修辞学”,是偏见,还是傲慢?怎样理解中国的古典修辞学?在全球化时代,应持怎样的修辞观?古典修辞学观照下的国际修辞学研究新趋势是什么?作者认为,修辞不仅是一种演说论辩、说服工具,也是一种道德修养,一种人生追求,一种使人生永恒的方式。它既是安身立命、治国安邦的重要手段,也是一种社会秩序、文化和文明样类,是通向仁爱、至善和世界大同的有效途径。全球修辞正在成为一种人类新秩序,一种学术思想碰撞与融合的新视野。
中國古代有沒有脩辭學思想?20世紀70年代,有西方學者提齣:“東方或中東沒有脩辭學”。如今這種觀點有所改變嗎?應從技術還是哲理層麵來髮掘中國的古典脩辭學思想?套用單一文化揹景下的西方古典論辯模式,還是立足多元文化揹景和全毬視角呢?這是一直睏擾東西方學者的一箇文化命題。本文從多元文化和全毬視角,“對話”中國古代先哲:孔子、鬼穀子、韓非子、叔孫豹和主父偃,以期彰顯中國古典脩辭思想文化的博大精深。本文迴答瞭以下問題:中國古代有脩辭學嗎?“西方之外無脩辭學”,是偏見,還是傲慢?怎樣理解中國的古典脩辭學?在全毬化時代,應持怎樣的脩辭觀?古典脩辭學觀照下的國際脩辭學研究新趨勢是什麽?作者認為,脩辭不僅是一種縯說論辯、說服工具,也是一種道德脩養,一種人生追求,一種使人生永恆的方式。它既是安身立命、治國安邦的重要手段,也是一種社會秩序、文化和文明樣類,是通嚮仁愛、至善和世界大同的有效途徑。全毬脩辭正在成為一種人類新秩序,一種學術思想踫撞與融閤的新視野。
중국고대유몰유수사학사상?20세기70년대,유서방학자제출:“동방혹중동몰유수사학”。여금저충관점유소개변마?응종기술환시철리층면래발굴중국적고전수사학사상?투용단일문화배경하적서방고전론변모식,환시립족다원문화배경화전구시각니?저시일직곤우동서방학자적일개문화명제。본문종다원문화화전구시각,“대화”중국고대선철:공자、귀곡자、한비자、숙손표화주부언,이기창현중국고전수사사상문화적박대정심。본문회답료이하문제:중국고대유수사학마?“서방지외무수사학”,시편견,환시오만?즘양리해중국적고전수사학?재전구화시대,응지즘양적수사관?고전수사학관조하적국제수사학연구신추세시십요?작자인위,수사불부시일충연설론변、설복공구,야시일충도덕수양,일충인생추구,일충사인생영항적방식。타기시안신립명、치국안방적중요수단,야시일충사회질서、문화화문명양류,시통향인애、지선화세계대동적유효도경。전구수사정재성위일충인류신질서,일충학술사상팽당여융합적신시야。
Was there rhetoric thought in ancient China? In the 1970s, a few Western scholars said: that there was no rhetoric tradition in the East or Middle East. Up to now, has this changed or not? Should we interpret Chinese classic rhetoric technically or philosophically? Should we interpret it by the categories of ancient Greece, from a single cultural background or from multi-cultural and global perspectives? This is a proposition which has puzzled both occidental and oriental scholars. In order to highlight the extensive and profound thought of rhetorical culture in ancient China, this paper conducts a dialogue with such ancient Chinese masters as Confucius, Kuei Ku Tzu (鬼谷子) ,Han Fei Tzu (韩非子) , Shusun Bao (叔孙豹) and Zhufu Yan (主父偃). The author tries to discuss and answer the following questions in this paper: Was there rhetoric in ancient China? Is the statement that no rhetoric tradition outside the West is cultural bias or arrogance? What is Chinese classic rhetoric? What concept of rhetoric should we take in times of globalization? What are the new trends of international rhetoric studies from the visual angle of Chinese classical rhetoric? The author thinks that rhetoric is a kind of moral cultivation, a life pursuit, a way which can make human life eternal and a tool of argument and persuasion. It is not only the important means of doing a good job in administering state affairs and ensuring national security, but also a social order, and a form of human culture and civilization. Rhetoric is also an effective way leading to benevolence, supreme good and universal harmony in the world. Global rhetoric is becoming a new social order of all human beings and a new vision of the confrontation and amalgamation of academic thoughts.