北京体育大学学报
北京體育大學學報
북경체육대학학보
Journal of Beijing University of Physical Education
2013年
8期
83~88
,共null页
情绪 情绪调节 自我控制 决策
情緒 情緒調節 自我控製 決策
정서 정서조절 자아공제 결책
emotion ; emotion regulation ; self-control; decision making
以风险即情绪模型(Loewenstein,2001)、情绪调节过程模型(Gross,2002)和自控损耗理论(Baumeister,etal,1998)为基础,采用自编的足球运动员决策系统,通过两个系列研究讨论了情绪调节方式及自控能力与足球运动员决策的关系。研究一采用情绪调节方式(5)×决策类型(2)混合设计,运用不同情绪调节方式对负性情绪进行调节,探讨不同情绪调节方式(评价忽视、评价重视、表情抑制、表情宣泄与简单观看)对足球运动员决策质量的影响。53名足球专项大学生参与实验,平均年龄(21.27±3.00)岁。结果表明不同的情绪调节方式会影响足球运动员的决策正确率:评价忽视组的决策正确率显著高于表情抑制组、表情宣泄组和简单观看组。研究二应用研究一筛选出的对于负性情绪应对最为有效的调节方式(评价忽视),进一步探索该情绪调节方式的效果是否受到运动员的自控能力的影响。实验设计为自控能力(2)×决策类型(2)混合设计,18名足球专项大学生参与实验,平均年龄(23.11±2.74)岁。结果表明情绪调节的效果受到足球运动员自控能力的影响:1)高自控能力足球运动员的决策正确率显著高于低自控能力的足球运动员;2)自控能力在决策类型对足球运动员决策的影响中起调节作用。
以風險即情緒模型(Loewenstein,2001)、情緒調節過程模型(Gross,2002)和自控損耗理論(Baumeister,etal,1998)為基礎,採用自編的足毬運動員決策繫統,通過兩箇繫列研究討論瞭情緒調節方式及自控能力與足毬運動員決策的關繫。研究一採用情緒調節方式(5)×決策類型(2)混閤設計,運用不同情緒調節方式對負性情緒進行調節,探討不同情緒調節方式(評價忽視、評價重視、錶情抑製、錶情宣洩與簡單觀看)對足毬運動員決策質量的影響。53名足毬專項大學生參與實驗,平均年齡(21.27±3.00)歲。結果錶明不同的情緒調節方式會影響足毬運動員的決策正確率:評價忽視組的決策正確率顯著高于錶情抑製組、錶情宣洩組和簡單觀看組。研究二應用研究一篩選齣的對于負性情緒應對最為有效的調節方式(評價忽視),進一步探索該情緒調節方式的效果是否受到運動員的自控能力的影響。實驗設計為自控能力(2)×決策類型(2)混閤設計,18名足毬專項大學生參與實驗,平均年齡(23.11±2.74)歲。結果錶明情緒調節的效果受到足毬運動員自控能力的影響:1)高自控能力足毬運動員的決策正確率顯著高于低自控能力的足毬運動員;2)自控能力在決策類型對足毬運動員決策的影響中起調節作用。
이풍험즉정서모형(Loewenstein,2001)、정서조절과정모형(Gross,2002)화자공손모이론(Baumeister,etal,1998)위기출,채용자편적족구운동원결책계통,통과량개계렬연구토론료정서조절방식급자공능력여족구운동원결책적관계。연구일채용정서조절방식(5)×결책류형(2)혼합설계,운용불동정서조절방식대부성정서진행조절,탐토불동정서조절방식(평개홀시、평개중시、표정억제、표정선설여간단관간)대족구운동원결책질량적영향。53명족구전항대학생삼여실험,평균년령(21.27±3.00)세。결과표명불동적정서조절방식회영향족구운동원적결책정학솔:평개홀시조적결책정학솔현저고우표정억제조、표정선설조화간단관간조。연구이응용연구일사선출적대우부성정서응대최위유효적조절방식(평개홀시),진일보탐색해정서조절방식적효과시부수도운동원적자공능력적영향。실험설계위자공능력(2)×결책류형(2)혼합설계,18명족구전항대학생삼여실험,평균년령(23.11±2.74)세。결과표명정서조절적효과수도족구운동원자공능력적영향:1)고자공능력족구운동원적결책정학솔현저고우저자공능력적족구운동원;2)자공능력재결책류형대족구운동원결책적영향중기조절작용。
Based on the risk-as-feelings model (Loewenstein, 2001 ), the process model of emotion regulation (Gross, 2002) and the self-control depletion theory (Baumeister, et al, 1998), two serial studies were designed to examine the correlations among emotion regulation, self-control and decision making of soccer players with the help of soccer players decision making test system. Study 1 adopted emotion regulation strategies (5) x decision making task (2) mixed-design experiment, and utilized emotion regulation strategies to regulate negative emotion to discuss the influence of emotion regulation strategies ( reappraisal, rumination, expressive suppression, expres- sive revealing) on the quality of decision making of soccer players. 53 college soccer players participated into the experiment, the average age was 21.27 ± 3.00. The results suggested that the decision making accuracy of the re-appraisal group was significantly higher than that of the expressive suppression, expressive revealing and control groups. Study 2 adopted self-control ability (2) × decision-making task (2) mixed-design and tried to explore whether the self-control ability could influence the effect of the reappraisal strategy under the negative emotion. 18 college soccer players participated into the experiment, the average age was 23.11 ± 2.74. The results suggested that the effect of the emotion regulation strategy was influenced by the self-control ability : 1 ) The decision making accuracy of soccer players with high self-control ability was significantly higher than those with low self-control a-bility; 2) Self-control ability moderated the relationship between decision making task and the quality of decision making.