CAJ | 학술논문

马克思运用历史唯物主义的方法发现了剩余价值和资产阶级统治的秘密，马克思主义因此被指认为科学的。但是，历史唯物主义本身也是历史的产物，它是不可能超越历史的。历史唯物主义可以帮助我们研究历史和现状，但历史唯物主义并不能帮助我们准确预测未来，历史唯物主义在“历史”面前到达这种理论的边界。我们对于历史唯物主义的审视参照卢卡奇对于“总体性”的反思和批判逐步展开，卢卡奇的“总体性”是“历史唯物主义”的一个变种。
마극사운용역사유물주의적방법발현료잉여개치화자산계급통치적비밀，마극사주의인차피지인위과학적。단시，역사유물주의본신야시역사적산물，타시불가능초월역사적。역사유물주의가이방조아문연구역사화현상，단역사유물주의병불능방조아문준학예측미래，역사유물주의재“역사”면전도체저충이론적변계。아문대우역사유물주의적심시삼조로잡기대우“총체성”적반사화비판축보전개，로잡기적“총체성”시“역사유물주의”적일개변충。
Using the method of historical materialism, Marx found the secret of the surplus value and of bour- geois rule, and Marxism was therefore identified as a science. However, historical materialism itself is a product of history, so it is impossible to transcend history. The science of historical materialism can not prove the science of all Marx＇s doctrines. The critique of historical materialism, with reference to Lukac＇s criticism of the ＂totality＂, is gradually expanded, but the so-called ＂totality＂ is nothing but a variant of historical materialism.