CAJ | 학술논문

《水浒传》中梁山聚义替天行道攻打官府的运动，到底是什么性质的，古往今来争论不休。古代文人多认为是忠义行为，也有部分正统文人认为是叛逆造反；上世纪20年代开始有人提出农民革命的说法，之后这一说法成为主导，似是不易之论；到了80年代才有人开始提出流民起义、忠义之举、武侠行为、反叛法律等非农民起义的观点。基于此，从传播学的视角对学术界关于《水浒传》梁山聚义性质的研究进行了解读分析，认为《水浒传》梁山聚义性质的研究是一个假命题，由于人们的错误理解而进入《水浒传》研究的范畴，再加上我国文史不分的传统、阶级分析法的引进和政治形势使然，使得这一命题的研究俨然成了现实中《水浒传》研究的必然议题。
《수호전》중량산취의체천행도공타관부적운동，도저시십요성질적，고왕금래쟁론불휴。고대문인다인위시충의행위，야유부분정통문인인위시반역조반；상세기20년대개시유인제출농민혁명적설법，지후저일설법성위주도，사시불역지론；도료80년대재유인개시제출류민기의、충의지거、무협행위、반반법률등비농민기의적관점。기우차，종전파학적시각대학술계관우《수호전》량산취의성질적연구진행료해독분석，인위《수호전》량산취의성질적연구시일개가명제，유우인문적착오리해이진입《수호전》연구적범주，재가상아국문사불분적전통、계급분석법적인진화정치형세사연，사득저일명제적연구엄연성료현실중《수호전》연구적필연의제。
What on earth is the quality of gathering for justice on Liangshan Mountain in The Water Margin？ Peo- ple have argued it for a long time. Most men of letters in history think it is right, but there are also some men of letters thinking it is wrong. Since 1980, some people have put forward the views of peasant revolt, and non-peas- ant revolt views, such as loyalty behavior, martial arts action, rebel law and so on. From the perspective of com- munication, this paper analyses the research of character of gathering for justice on Liangshan Mountaifi in The Water Margin in the academic community, which is proved to be false. Studies of this proposition has become the inevitable issue of The Water Margin due to wrong understanding of the research category into The Water Mar- gin, China＇s tradition of mixing literature and history, the introducing of class analysis method, and the political situation.