西北大学学报:哲学社会科学版
西北大學學報:哲學社會科學版
서북대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Northwest University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
2013年
5期
147~152
,共null页
城市融合 测度农民工 文献综述
城市融閤 測度農民工 文獻綜述
성시융합 측도농민공 문헌종술
urban integration, measure ; migrant workers ; literature review
由于社会融合测量的不同维度及每一个维度测量指标之间的差异,目前国内外学者们对如何解构社会融合的维度并未形成统一的意见,也未能找到具有共识性的测量工具。从国内有关研究农民工城市融合程度测量方法与工具的成果来看,测量内容、测量形式和技术方法上的复杂性、多样性已经使得农民工城市融合程度的测度成为近年来中国农民工城市融入问题的研究难点与重点。从整体来看,相关研究已经通过对零散的、缺乏内在逻辑的单个评价指标进行衡量,发展到基于特定的理论框架构建独立的指标体系进行测度,呈现出测度指标更为科学、全面,评价结果更为客观的主要特点,但其中仍存在主客观测度指标界定不清晰、缺乏对融合过程的动态考察等问题。
由于社會融閤測量的不同維度及每一箇維度測量指標之間的差異,目前國內外學者們對如何解構社會融閤的維度併未形成統一的意見,也未能找到具有共識性的測量工具。從國內有關研究農民工城市融閤程度測量方法與工具的成果來看,測量內容、測量形式和技術方法上的複雜性、多樣性已經使得農民工城市融閤程度的測度成為近年來中國農民工城市融入問題的研究難點與重點。從整體來看,相關研究已經通過對零散的、缺乏內在邏輯的單箇評價指標進行衡量,髮展到基于特定的理論框架構建獨立的指標體繫進行測度,呈現齣測度指標更為科學、全麵,評價結果更為客觀的主要特點,但其中仍存在主客觀測度指標界定不清晰、缺乏對融閤過程的動態攷察等問題。
유우사회융합측량적불동유도급매일개유도측량지표지간적차이,목전국내외학자문대여하해구사회융합적유도병미형성통일적의견,야미능조도구유공식성적측량공구。종국내유관연구농민공성시융합정도측량방법여공구적성과래간,측량내용、측량형식화기술방법상적복잡성、다양성이경사득농민공성시융합정도적측도성위근년래중국농민공성시융입문제적연구난점여중점。종정체래간,상관연구이경통과대령산적、결핍내재라집적단개평개지표진행형량,발전도기우특정적이론광가구건독립적지표체계진행측도,정현출측도지표경위과학、전면,평개결과경위객관적주요특점,단기중잉존재주객관측도지표계정불청석、결핍대융합과정적동태고찰등문제。
Because of the different measuring dimensions of social integration and the differences between different measuring dimensions, the scholars so far have not agreed on the how to deconstruct the social integration dimension and have not found out the measurement tool. From the result of the tool and the measurement of the integration of the farmers with the city, the complexity of the measuring content, forms and the methods and the diversity of the migrant workers in the city have made it important and difficult. Overall, the research has been fragmented by the lack of internal logic of a single evaluation measure, the development of a theoretical framework based on a specific index system to build a separate measure, shows a more specific measure index, a comprehensive evaluation result and the more features of a more objectivity, but there is still no clear definition of subjective and objective measure- ment indicators, the lack of integration of the dynamic process of investigation and other issues.