CAJ | 학술논문

气候问题上，英国、加拿大、中国分别代表了欧盟、伞形集团、发展中国家的谈判立场。本文首先用批评隐喻分析的方法定量分析以上三方在德班大会发言中的隐喻使用差别；然后从概念隐喻的角度定性分析各方所用隐喻背后隐含的政治动机；最后依次探讨三个国家是如何通过隐喻来构建“自我一他人”身份。研究表明，发言人的政治立场影响了其对隐喻的选择和使用，英、加、中三国在身份构建中体现了不同的“自我一他人”定位，从而服务于各自所属团体的利益。
기후문제상，영국、가나대、중국분별대표료구맹、산형집단、발전중국가적담판립장。본문수선용비평은유분석적방법정량분석이상삼방재덕반대회발언중적은유사용차별；연후종개념은유적각도정성분석각방소용은유배후은함적정치동궤；최후의차탐토삼개국가시여하통과은유래구건“자아일타인”신빈。연구표명，발언인적정치립장영향료기대은유적선택화사용，영、가、중삼국재신빈구건중체현료불동적“자아일타인”정위，종이복무우각자소속단체적이익。
In terms of climate negotiation standpoint, the UK, Canada and China represent the interests of the European Union, Umbrella Group and the developing countries respectively. Quantitatively, this article uses Critical Metaphor Analysis to analyze these countries＇ statements in the 2011 Durban Climate Change Conference. Qualitatively, 3 conceptual metaphors are analyzed to shed light upon the hidden political motivations. Besides, how the 3 countries use metaphors to construct their ＂Self-Other＂ identities is also discussed. Research result shows that political standpoints influence the use of metaphors, and the UK, Canada and China construct ＂Self-Other＂ identities discriminately during the conference to serve for their own group＇s interest.