CAJ | 학술논문

本研究探讨不同领域的规则（安全领域规则，个人领域规则）和不同的规则提出者（成人权威，同辈权威）对儿童判断的影响。研究考察了48名4～7岁的儿童在道义推理、奖惩判断、愿望理解和行为判断的发展变化特点。结果表明：（1）直到7岁儿童才能根据规则的不同特点做出不同的判断，7岁儿童预测更不应该违反安全领域规则，违反安全领域规则和成人权威制定的规则后应该受到更多的批评，而4岁组和5岁组儿童在不同规则情境下的判断没有显著差异；（2）各年龄组儿童预测应该给予表扬的数量在各情境下没有显著差异；（3）在规则与愿望相冲突时，高年龄组儿童比低年龄组儿童更多地报告主人公会坚持自己的愿望；（4）在预测主人公是否会违反规则上，各年龄组在不同规则情境下均无显著差异。
본연구탐토불동영역적규칙（안전영역규칙，개인영역규칙）화불동적규칙제출자（성인권위，동배권위）대인동판단적영향。연구고찰료48명4～7세적인동재도의추리、장징판단、원망리해화행위판단적발전변화특점。결과표명：（1）직도7세인동재능근거규칙적불동특점주출불동적판단，7세인동예측경불응해위반안전영역규칙，위반안전영역규칙화성인권위제정적규칙후응해수도경다적비평，이4세조화5세조인동재불동규칙정경하적판단몰유현저차이；（2）각년령조인동예측응해급여표양적수량재각정경하몰유현저차이；（3）재규칙여원망상충돌시，고년령조인동비저년령조인동경다지보고주인공회견지자기적원망；（4）재예측주인공시부회위반규칙상，각년령조재불동규칙정경하균무현저차이。
This study explored the influence of different domains （prudential domain; personal domain） and different authorities （adult ; peer） on children＇ s judgments. 48 children aged from 4 to 7 participated. The results showed that：（ 1 ） 7-year-olds had a more complex understanding of rule. They predicted that the protagonists shouldn＇ t break rules of prudential domain more than rules of personal domain and should be criticized more for breaking rules of prudential domain. And they also predicted that the protagonists should be criticized more for breaking the rule claimed by adult authority. Whereas 4 and 5-year-olds＇ predictions did not differ significantly in different rule situations. （2） Children＇ s predictions of praise didu＇ t differ significantly across conditions. （3） Older children are more inclined to predict that a protagonist would insist to do what he prefers, even though there is a prohibitive rule. （4） There was no significant difference on behavior predictions. The amount of children who predict compliance and transgression are even.