首都体育学院学报
首都體育學院學報
수도체육학원학보
Journal of Capital College of Physical Education
2013年
5期
441~445
,共null页
奥运会 田径项目 金牌区域 聚类分析
奧運會 田徑項目 金牌區域 聚類分析
오운회 전경항목 금패구역 취류분석
Olympic Games; athletics; regional acquisition of gold medals; classified analysis
运用文献资料、数理统计等研究方法,对第22~29届奥运会田径各项目金牌的区域归属进行统计分析,结果表明:田径各项目金牌强势板块为欧洲、北美洲,较强势板块为非洲,弱势板块为亚洲、大洋洲及南美洲.强势板块中,欧洲各项目发展较为均衡,连续性稳定性较好,但随着时间的推进,其整体竞技实力呈减弱趋势;北美洲在速度性项目中,以绝对优势占据不可撼动的霸主席位,而且稳定性连续性较好,快速力量项目上有明显的性别差异.较强势板块中,非洲军团在奥运会田径竞赛项目上比较单调、各项目发展不均衡,主要以耐力性项目为主.弱势板块中,亚洲、大洋洲及南美洲没有形成连续稳定的发展项目,整体处于低发展水平.
運用文獻資料、數理統計等研究方法,對第22~29屆奧運會田徑各項目金牌的區域歸屬進行統計分析,結果錶明:田徑各項目金牌彊勢闆塊為歐洲、北美洲,較彊勢闆塊為非洲,弱勢闆塊為亞洲、大洋洲及南美洲.彊勢闆塊中,歐洲各項目髮展較為均衡,連續性穩定性較好,但隨著時間的推進,其整體競技實力呈減弱趨勢;北美洲在速度性項目中,以絕對優勢佔據不可撼動的霸主席位,而且穩定性連續性較好,快速力量項目上有明顯的性彆差異.較彊勢闆塊中,非洲軍糰在奧運會田徑競賽項目上比較單調、各項目髮展不均衡,主要以耐力性項目為主.弱勢闆塊中,亞洲、大洋洲及南美洲沒有形成連續穩定的髮展項目,整體處于低髮展水平.
운용문헌자료、수리통계등연구방법,대제22~29계오운회전경각항목금패적구역귀속진행통계분석,결과표명:전경각항목금패강세판괴위구주、북미주,교강세판괴위비주,약세판괴위아주、대양주급남미주.강세판괴중,구주각항목발전교위균형,련속성은정성교호,단수착시간적추진,기정체경기실력정감약추세;북미주재속도성항목중,이절대우세점거불가감동적패주석위,이차은정성련속성교호,쾌속역량항목상유명현적성별차이.교강세판괴중,비주군단재오운회전경경새항목상비교단조、각항목발전불균형,주요이내력성항목위주.약세판괴중,아주、대양주급남미주몰유형성련속은정적발전항목,정체처우저발전수평.
Through the research methods of literature review and statistical analysis, this paper analyzes the regional acquisition of gold medals in athletics from 22th to 29th Olympic Games. The results show that the most powerful continents in acquiring gold medals in athletics are Europe and North America, after which is Africa, while Asia, Oceania and South America are the least powerful continents. Among the most powerful continents, the development of different games in athletics in Europe is more balanced and with better continuity and stability. However, the overall standard in athletics in Europe assumes the de- clining trend along with time. North America occupies an unshakable position in speed games and enjoys better continuity and stability although it exhibits apparent difference in different genders. Among the least powerful continents, Africa exhibits a rather monotonous feature in athletics in Olympic Games and, being strong in endurance games, the development of different games is not well-balanced. In contrast, there are no continuous and stable games in development in Asia, Oceania, South America, and the overall development on low level.