CAJ | 학술논문

女性主义技术科学研究标志着当代女性主义科学研究的后人类主义转向。它以哈拉维的情境知识论和赛博本体论为主要理论来源及思想动力，以图安娜的互动主义、芭拉德的能动实在论和格罗兹的身体研究为代表，主张将对科学技术的批判与对父权制文化、性别关系和身份政治的批判结合起来，引导人们在技术科学实践和文化中去探究科学与技术、性别、自然（包括身体）、文化（社会）等之间辩证互动和异质融合的后人类主义特征的内在动态关系。这有效地摆脱了当前女性主义研究中生物决定论和社会建构论之争所陷入的本质主义表征困境。
녀성주의기술과학연구표지착당대녀성주의과학연구적후인류주의전향。타이합랍유적정경지식론화새박본체론위주요이론래원급사상동력，이도안나적호동주의、파랍덕적능동실재론화격라자적신체연구위대표，주장장대과학기술적비판여대부권제문화、성별관계화신빈정치적비판결합기래，인도인문재기술과학실천화문화중거탐구과학여기술、성별、자연（포괄신체）、문화（사회）등지간변증호동화이질융합적후인류주의특정적내재동태관계。저유효지파탈료당전녀성주의연구중생물결정론화사회건구론지쟁소함입적본질주의표정곤경。
Feminism Technoscience Studies mark the Posthumanism turn of contemporary feminist science studies. They are derived from Donna Haraway＇s situated knowledge theory and eyborg on- tology and represented by Nancy Tuana＇s interaetionism, Karen Barad＇s agential realism, and Eliz- abeth Grosz＇s body studies. They argue the critique of science and technology should be combined with the posthumanism critique of patriarchy culture, gender relationship and identification politics, guiding people to explore the inherent dynamic relationships of post-humanism characteristics of dia- lectical interaction and heterogeneous integration between science and technology, gender, nature （including body）, and culture （society）, which e[[ectively avoid the dilemma of representationalism brought by the debates between biological determinism and social construetionism in current feminist studies.