CAJ | 학술논문

美国作为最具创新能力和科研影响力的国家，一直是我国的追赶对象。国际权威文献情报机构汤森路透（ThomsonReuters）,公司新近推出InCites科研评价数据库，为比较中关两国科研实力提供了可靠的数据。从发文数量、质量和影响力三个角度，对比中关两国科研实力在1981到2011年间发生的变化趋势。结果发现，过去30多年，我国发文数量呈指数型增长，质量也有显著提升。22个学科门类的影响力也在稳步上升，逐渐接近全球平均水平。但是与美国相比，无论在数量、质量还是影响力上。仍有很大差距。今后，我国需要在继续加大科研投入的同时，厘清各学科发展定位，针对不同发展阶段的学科采取不同的资源配置和发展策略。建立以创新和质量为导向的科研评价体系。
미국작위최구창신능력화과연영향력적국가，일직시아국적추간대상。국제권위문헌정보궤구탕삼로투（ThomsonReuters）,공사신근추출InCites과연평개수거고，위비교중관량국과연실력제공료가고적수거。종발문수량、질량화영향력삼개각도，대비중관량국과연실력재1981도2011년간발생적변화추세。결과발현，과거30다년，아국발문수량정지수형증장，질량야유현저제승。22개학과문류적영향력야재은보상승，축점접근전구평균수평。단시여미국상비，무론재수량、질량환시영향력상。잉유흔대차거。금후，아국수요재계속가대과연투입적동시，전청각학과발전정위，침대불동발전계단적학과채취불동적자원배치화발전책략。건립이창신화질량위도향적과연평개체계。
As the most influential and innovative nation in the world, U.S. is always the model which China is aiming for. Thomson Reuters, an international institute specalized for documentation and information, recently publishes a new database called InCites, which provides reliable data to compare the Sino-U.S. gap in research. From views of quantity, quality and impact, this study compare the research development of the two nations between 1981 and 2011. The results show that over three decades, China＇s publications grow as an exponential function, with an increasingly higher quality. Most of 22 disciplines have shown larger impact worldwide, getting closer to international average. However, compared with the U.S., the quantity and quality of publications and impact of 22 disciplines in China are still left Meanwhile, by identifying the different status allocation and strategies to different disciplines, system. behind. In the further, China has to invest more in research. of different disciplines, the government should apply different build up the innovation-and-quality-based research assessment