深圳大学学报:人文社会科学版
深圳大學學報:人文社會科學版
심수대학학보:인문사회과학판
Journal of Shenzhen University(Humanities & Social Sciences)
2013年
5期
66~70
,共null页
企业家 经济人 自利行为假设 利益目标 伦理确认
企業傢 經濟人 自利行為假設 利益目標 倫理確認
기업가 경제인 자리행위가설 이익목표 윤리학인
entrepreneur; economic man; the assumption of self-serving behavior; objective of interest; ethical confirmation
企业家经济人的伦理确认是企业伦理的重要前提之一。阿马蒂亚.森对“经济人”的“自利行为假设”进行了深刻的批判,认为自利行为假设是没有根据的。长期以来。主流经济学家关于“经济人”自利最大化的认识是一种误解。作为从道德哲学(伦理学)中诞生,并自立门户的经济学,必须回到伦理学去。经济学研究的学科独立性并没有在内涵上去伦理化.经济学仍然具有道德属性。作为经济人的企业家是一个现实的社会个体.由错误的自利行为假设前提出发.从而推定在这一个体身上必然发生道德人与经济人的人格分裂事实的结论.自然是错误的。其实.企业家经济人基于现实利益目标,必然是经济人与道德人的复合,无论从经济学理论缘起、发展,以及生产实践中,企业家经济人都能够得到企业家道德人的伦理确认.
企業傢經濟人的倫理確認是企業倫理的重要前提之一。阿馬蒂亞.森對“經濟人”的“自利行為假設”進行瞭深刻的批判,認為自利行為假設是沒有根據的。長期以來。主流經濟學傢關于“經濟人”自利最大化的認識是一種誤解。作為從道德哲學(倫理學)中誕生,併自立門戶的經濟學,必鬚迴到倫理學去。經濟學研究的學科獨立性併沒有在內涵上去倫理化.經濟學仍然具有道德屬性。作為經濟人的企業傢是一箇現實的社會箇體.由錯誤的自利行為假設前提齣髮.從而推定在這一箇體身上必然髮生道德人與經濟人的人格分裂事實的結論.自然是錯誤的。其實.企業傢經濟人基于現實利益目標,必然是經濟人與道德人的複閤,無論從經濟學理論緣起、髮展,以及生產實踐中,企業傢經濟人都能夠得到企業傢道德人的倫理確認.
기업가경제인적윤리학인시기업윤리적중요전제지일。아마체아.삼대“경제인”적“자리행위가설”진행료심각적비판,인위자리행위가설시몰유근거적。장기이래。주류경제학가관우“경제인”자리최대화적인식시일충오해。작위종도덕철학(윤리학)중탄생,병자립문호적경제학,필수회도윤리학거。경제학연구적학과독립성병몰유재내함상거윤리화.경제학잉연구유도덕속성。작위경제인적기업가시일개현실적사회개체.유착오적자리행위가설전제출발.종이추정재저일개체신상필연발생도덕인여경제인적인격분렬사실적결론.자연시착오적。기실.기업가경제인기우현실이익목표,필연시경제인여도덕인적복합,무론종경제학이론연기、발전,이급생산실천중,기업가경제인도능구득도기업가도덕인적윤리학인.
Entrepreneur as an economic man is one of the most important premises of enterprise ethic. Amartya Sen scathingly critiqued the"assumption of self-serving behavior'of "economic man," arguing that this assumption is groundless. The idea that has long been entertained by mainstream economists that economic man tries everything to maximize his own interest is a misconception. Economics, which originally grew out of moral philosophy and then became a separate discipline, must now return to ethics. Though an independent research field, economics can not rid itself of moral consideration--its subject matter is not completely amoral. An entrepreneur is an economic man, but he is in reality a social being. The assumption of self-interest implies the split of the moral person from the economic person of the same individual, which falsifies the assumption itself. In fact, entrepreneur as an economic man who aims at real interest must at the same time be a moral man. With regards the genesis and development of economics and the practice of production, an entrepreneur should not only be taken as an economic man. but his moral nersnnnlitv t ~1~, h ~;~d