CAJ | 학술논문

对行为意图的理解是人类进行道德判断的重要依据,大量研究表明,右侧颞顶联合区是意图加工的关键脑区。为考察该脑区在道德判断中的重要作用,采用经颅直流电刺激技术阳极刺激右侧颞顶联合区,探讨促进该脑区的活动对被试在道德判断中意图及相关信息加工的影响。结果发现与假刺激条件相比,阳极刺激后道德判断反应时显著延长,在伤人未遂和意外伤人条件下差异显著,证明促进右侧颞顶联合区的激活能影响道德判断中的意图加工,尤其在意图与结果产生冲突的条件下效应更加显著。
대행위의도적리해시인류진행도덕판단적중요의거,대량연구표명,우측섭정연합구시의도가공적관건뇌구。위고찰해뇌구재도덕판단중적중요작용,채용경로직류전자격기술양겁자격우측섭정연합구,탐토촉진해뇌구적활동대피시재도덕판단중의도급상관신식가공적영향。결과발현여가자격조건상비,양겁자격후도덕판단반응시현저연장,재상인미수화의외상인조건하차이현저,증명촉진우측섭정연합구적격활능영향도덕판단중적의도가공,우기재의도여결과산생충돌적조건하효응경가현저。
When we evaluate the moral status of an action,we consider not only its consequences but also the beliefs and intentions of the actor,which relies on the capacity to infer others＇ mental states.Functional MRI studies showed that the right temporo-parietal junction（RTPJ） is the critical brain region for understanding others＇ mental states.Previous studies have found that the role of intention processing in moral judgment was reduced by disrupting the RTPJ with transcranial magnetic stimulation（TMS）.In the current study,we enhanced the role of intention processing in moral judgment with the transcranial direct current sitmulation（tDCS）,a painless,non-invasive brain stimulation technique that allows us to induce polarity-specific excitability changes in the human brain.Many tDCS studies have confirmed the anodal excitation effect for cognitive functions.However,so far,limited work has been done to explore the tDCS effect on social cognitive function such as moral judgment.Therefore,the present study aims to investigate the anodal excitation effect of tDCS on moral judgment.We hypothesize that exciting the neural activity of RTPJ with anodal tDCS could enhance the role of intention processing in moral judgment.To test our hypothesis,18 healthy college students were recruited to participate in the study.All subjects underwent two tDCS sessions（anodal and sham tDCS） in random order and counterbalanced across subjects on 2 separate days with 1 week interval between both stimulations.We applied anodal（1.5mA,20 min） and sham tDCS（1.5mA,15 sec） on the RTPJ while subjects were introduced to keep a resting state.After stimulation,subjects read stories in a 2（intention： negative vs.neutral） × 2（outcome： negative vs.neutral） design and were asked to make moral judgment about how much blame the actor deserves.We analyzed the moral evaluation score and reaction time by a 2（intention） × 2（outcome） × 2（tDCS： anodal,sham） repeated measures ANOVA.Results showed that actors with negative intentions were judged more morally blameworthy than those with neutral intentions,and actors producing negative outcomes were judged more blameworthy than those causing neutral outcomes.The differences between no harm（neutral intention,neutral outcome） and accidental harm（neutral intention,negative outcome） were larger than that between attempted harm（negative intention,neutral outcome） and successful harm（negative intention,negative outcome）.For the reaction time,judgments of negative outcomes were faster than that of neutral outcomes.The responses to attempted and accidental harm were slower than the other two conditions.Most importantly,the moral judgment was slower under anodal tDCS than sham tDCS stimulation,especially under the attempted harm and accidental harm conditions.These results highlight the role of intention processing in moral judgment.People will spend more time integrating the intention and outcome information in order to make normal moral judgment.Furthermore,the present research provides us a better understanding about the role of RTPJ in moral judgment.Using anodal tDCS to excite the neural activity of RTPJ enhanced the capacity of mentalizing in moral judgment,especially in the cases of attempted harm and accidental harm.