高等教育研究
高等教育研究
고등교육연구
Journal of Higher Education
2013年
9期
23~31
,共null页
人力资本 高校教师 薪酬差异
人力資本 高校教師 薪酬差異
인력자본 고교교사 신수차이
human capital; faculty; remuneration difference
对全国11个省份68所高校3612名教师的实证研究发现:体现在高校教师知识积累、学术视野、技能能力、经验与素养上的人力资本积累对其薪酬具有显著作用,具体表现为受教育程度、留学经历、在职培训、教龄对高校教师的薪酬差异具有显著影响,其中教龄对教师薪酬的作用最大,在职培训的作用最小。相对于学士学位的教师来说,拥有博士学位和具有留学博士教育经历对薪酬的影响更突出;国外访学对教师薪酬的效应更显著,国内信息技术单项培训对教师薪酬基本无影响;教龄对高校教师薪酬的影响较大,但多通过职称晋升来实现,在相同职称等级上工作年限对薪酬的影响并不显著。
對全國11箇省份68所高校3612名教師的實證研究髮現:體現在高校教師知識積纍、學術視野、技能能力、經驗與素養上的人力資本積纍對其薪酬具有顯著作用,具體錶現為受教育程度、留學經歷、在職培訓、教齡對高校教師的薪酬差異具有顯著影響,其中教齡對教師薪酬的作用最大,在職培訓的作用最小。相對于學士學位的教師來說,擁有博士學位和具有留學博士教育經歷對薪酬的影響更突齣;國外訪學對教師薪酬的效應更顯著,國內信息技術單項培訓對教師薪酬基本無影響;教齡對高校教師薪酬的影響較大,但多通過職稱晉升來實現,在相同職稱等級上工作年限對薪酬的影響併不顯著。
대전국11개성빈68소고교3612명교사적실증연구발현:체현재고교교사지식적루、학술시야、기능능력、경험여소양상적인력자본적루대기신수구유현저작용,구체표현위수교육정도、류학경력、재직배훈、교령대고교교사적신수차이구유현저영향,기중교령대교사신수적작용최대,재직배훈적작용최소。상대우학사학위적교사래설,옹유박사학위화구유류학박사교육경력대신수적영향경돌출;국외방학대교사신수적효응경현저,국내신식기술단항배훈대교사신수기본무영향;교령대고교교사신수적영향교대,단다통과직칭진승래실현,재상동직칭등급상공작년한대신수적영향병불현저。
It is an empirical study on faculty remuneration with the 3612 samples from 68 higher education institutions located at 11 provinces in China, based on human capital theo-ry. It finds that the accumulated human capital in knowledge, vision, capacity and skills, and experience of faculty members is with a significant effect. The details are that the degree of education, study abroad, on-job training, and the years of being academics impact on the faculty remuneration differences. Among these variables, the year of being academics is with the most significant, and on-ob training is the least one. In the degree of education and stud- y abroad, in contrast to bachelor degree holders, receiving doctoral degrees and specially in another country rather than China are With significant influences, and master degrees even from oversea are with small influence on the remuneration. On-job training, beingvisiting scholars abroad is with the strongest effect, but it is no influence on remuneration if trained domestically on information and technology. The study also finds that although the year of being academics provides the biggest influence on faculty remuneration, its achievement goes through rank promotion. At a certain rank, the year of being this position is not significant effect on faculty remuneration. These conclusions in this study offer some good policy refer-ences for understanding the characteristics of current faculty remuneration system and sol-ving the problems in the remuneration distribution.