学术月刊
學術月刊
학술월간
Academic Monthly
2013年
10期
118~126
,共null页
《诗经》 抒情诗 公共性
《詩經》 抒情詩 公共性
《시경》 서정시 공공성
The Book of Songs, lyric, publicity
《诗经》的创作和结集并不出于个人抒情的目的。其中大部分诗篇与政治、道德、社会等公共领域密切相关,代表了群体的经验,并多采取群体性的表述视角。即使以表现爱情或感伤情绪为主的诗篇,其情感呈现也往往依托公共的道德伦理规范、共同的社会风俗仪式以及诗乐舞合一的表演形式等公共性平台展开,成为公共化而非个人抒情的诗歌类型。《诗经》的情感描摹缺乏个性和明确的抒情主人公,并非表达个人独特的情感体验。从流传的角度看,《诗经》在先秦大规模地公开传播,时人并未将它视为个人抒情诗,而赋予其政治辞今、教育手段、仪式乐歌等公共文本功能。因此可以说,《诗经》表现出鲜明的公共性倾向,并不符合西方“抒情诗”的标准,也与中国语境中的“缘情”概念有深刻的差异。
《詩經》的創作和結集併不齣于箇人抒情的目的。其中大部分詩篇與政治、道德、社會等公共領域密切相關,代錶瞭群體的經驗,併多採取群體性的錶述視角。即使以錶現愛情或感傷情緒為主的詩篇,其情感呈現也往往依託公共的道德倫理規範、共同的社會風俗儀式以及詩樂舞閤一的錶縯形式等公共性平檯展開,成為公共化而非箇人抒情的詩歌類型。《詩經》的情感描摹缺乏箇性和明確的抒情主人公,併非錶達箇人獨特的情感體驗。從流傳的角度看,《詩經》在先秦大規模地公開傳播,時人併未將它視為箇人抒情詩,而賦予其政治辭今、教育手段、儀式樂歌等公共文本功能。因此可以說,《詩經》錶現齣鮮明的公共性傾嚮,併不符閤西方“抒情詩”的標準,也與中國語境中的“緣情”概唸有深刻的差異。
《시경》적창작화결집병불출우개인서정적목적。기중대부분시편여정치、도덕、사회등공공영역밀절상관,대표료군체적경험,병다채취군체성적표술시각。즉사이표현애정혹감상정서위주적시편,기정감정현야왕왕의탁공공적도덕윤리규범、공동적사회풍속의식이급시악무합일적표연형식등공공성평태전개,성위공공화이비개인서정적시가류형。《시경》적정감묘모결핍개성화명학적서정주인공,병비표체개인독특적정감체험。종류전적각도간,《시경》재선진대규모지공개전파,시인병미장타시위개인서정시,이부여기정치사금、교육수단、의식악가등공공문본공능。인차가이설,《시경》표현출선명적공공성경향,병불부합서방“서정시”적표준,야여중국어경중적“연정”개념유심각적차이。
The Book of Songs didn't express personal emotions. The content of most poems was related with the public sphere, such as the politics, sacrifice, ritual, morality and so on, and these poems weren't composed from an individual perspective. Even the poems with love or sentimental themes, which should be used for expressing private feelings, were also linked to the public sphere. So these poems lacked lyric protagonists and individual sentiments. The mode of communication of The Book of Songs in the pre-Qin Dynasty also reflected its publicity. The poems in The Book of Songs served as political rhetoric, means of education and the ritual songs. They were public rather than lyric in character. Therefore, it is inappropriate to define the poems in The Book of Songs with the Western definition of the lyric or the term Yuanqing("缘情") in Chinese poetics.