海南大学学报：人文社会科学版
海南大學學報：人文社會科學版
해남대학학보：인문사회과학판
Humanities & Social Sciences Journal of Hainan University
2013年
5期
82~88
,共null页
盗窃 数额较大 数额（特别）巨大
盜竊 數額較大 數額（特彆）巨大
도절 수액교대 수액（특별）거대
theft; large amount; （extremely） huge amount
盗窃罪中明文规定的“数额较大”应当属于客观的构成要件要素，根据构成要件的故意规则机能，行为人对其应该有认识；而根据司法解释之规定，我国在财物的价值判断模式上采取了客观的价值说，只有行为人所盗窃的财物数额达到较大时，才能以盗窃罪论处；盗窃罪中的“数额（特别）巨大”属于量刑规则，即使行为人对数额（特别）巨大存在认识的可能性，也不能按照数额（特别）巨大的标准定罪处刑。
盜竊罪中明文規定的“數額較大”應噹屬于客觀的構成要件要素，根據構成要件的故意規則機能，行為人對其應該有認識；而根據司法解釋之規定，我國在財物的價值判斷模式上採取瞭客觀的價值說，隻有行為人所盜竊的財物數額達到較大時，纔能以盜竊罪論處；盜竊罪中的“數額（特彆）巨大”屬于量刑規則，即使行為人對數額（特彆）巨大存在認識的可能性，也不能按照數額（特彆）巨大的標準定罪處刑。
도절죄중명문규정적“수액교대”응당속우객관적구성요건요소，근거구성요건적고의규칙궤능，행위인대기응해유인식；이근거사법해석지규정，아국재재물적개치판단모식상채취료객관적개치설，지유행위인소도절적재물수액체도교대시，재능이도절죄론처；도절죄중적“수액（특별）거대”속우양형규칙，즉사행위인대수액（특별）거대존재인식적가능성，야불능안조수액（특별）거대적표준정죄처형。
The ＂large amount＂ stipulated in the theft crime should belong to the factor of objective constitutive elements, and the actor is supposed to be aware of this according to the deliberate rule of constitutive elements. According to the provision in China＇ s judicial interpretation, the objective value theory is adopted in the judging mode of property value. And only when the value of property burglary reaches the large amount will the actor be punished with the theft crime. However, tencing rules and the actor, even though crime according to the standards of the （ the ＂（extremely） huge amount＂ in the theft crime belongs to the sen-having the possibility of understanding this, cannot be convicted of a extremely） huge amount.
