CAJ | 학술논문

“哲学的终结”、“批评的终结”、“艺术的终结”，这是后现代主义批评家所关注的三个终极问题。大部分后现代主义学者用不同的方式认同这些观点，而玛乔瑞·帕洛夫在著作《激进的艺术：媒体时代的诗歌创作》中，在梳理西方诗歌发展流变的同时，又借用诗歌的审美特性分析这些问题，认为它们并没有终结，而是“又一次先锋的激进艺术”的体现，其中就有诗歌创作对它们带来的积极影响：大众媒体诗性化、大众产品诗性化、诗学话语舞台化。
“철학적종결”、“비평적종결”、“예술적종결”，저시후현대주의비평가소관주적삼개종겁문제。대부분후현대주의학자용불동적방식인동저사관점，이마교서·파락부재저작《격진적예술：매체시대적시가창작》중，재소리서방시가발전류변적동시，우차용시가적심미특성분석저사문제，인위타문병몰유종결，이시“우일차선봉적격진예술”적체현，기중취유시가창작대타문대래적적겁영향：대음매체시성화、대음산품시성화、시학화어무태화。
＂The end of philosophy,＂＂the end of criticism,＂ and ＂the end of art＂ are three most concerned questions for postmodernists, most of whom accepted the conclusions though they explained them from different perspectives. However, Marjorie Perloff definitely denies the three conclusions in Radical Artifice： Writing Poetry in the Age of Media, arguing that philosophy, criticism, and art have not come to an end, on the contrary, this is another reflection of ＂the radical artifice of the Avant Garde,＂ which exhibits the positive influence of poetry： poeticizing the mass media and the mass products, and performing the poetry discourse.