经济管理
經濟管理
경제관리
Economic Management Journal(EMJ)
2013年
11期
189~198
,共null页
政治关系 控股股东性质 市场化程度 薪酬业绩敏感度
政治關繫 控股股東性質 市場化程度 薪酬業績敏感度
정치관계 공고고동성질 시장화정도 신수업적민감도
political relations ; controlling shareholder' nature ; marketization degree ; PPS
本文从控股股东性质、市场化程度两个维度对样本上市公司进行分组,构建面板数据进行实证检验并进行对比分析,研究了不同类型高管政治关系对上市公司高管薪酬一业绩敏感度的影响。研究发现,国有上市公司的高管薪酬一业绩敏感度较高,而且显著受政治关系的影响,不同类型政治关系的影响不同,在不同市场化程度的地区其影响也不同;民营上市公司的高管薪酬与业绩不具有显著相关性,但政治关系会提高其高管薪酬一业绩敏感度。
本文從控股股東性質、市場化程度兩箇維度對樣本上市公司進行分組,構建麵闆數據進行實證檢驗併進行對比分析,研究瞭不同類型高管政治關繫對上市公司高管薪酬一業績敏感度的影響。研究髮現,國有上市公司的高管薪酬一業績敏感度較高,而且顯著受政治關繫的影響,不同類型政治關繫的影響不同,在不同市場化程度的地區其影響也不同;民營上市公司的高管薪酬與業績不具有顯著相關性,但政治關繫會提高其高管薪酬一業績敏感度。
본문종공고고동성질、시장화정도량개유도대양본상시공사진행분조,구건면판수거진행실증검험병진행대비분석,연구료불동류형고관정치관계대상시공사고관신수일업적민감도적영향。연구발현,국유상시공사적고관신수일업적민감도교고,이차현저수정치관계적영향,불동류형정치관계적영향불동,재불동시장화정도적지구기영향야불동;민영상시공사적고관신수여업적불구유현저상관성,단정치관계회제고기고관신수일업적민감도。
Many Top managers of listed companies have Political relations in China. They are or were govern- ment officials, NPC representatives, CPCCC members and so on. Considering the special economic environment, the political relations play an important role in building Guanxi with central and local governments and rent see- king. It should be the urgent matter for listed companies to research and design effective salary incentive mecha- nism. This paper helps in the design of salary incentive mechanism and offers further support for the salary incentive theory. Different with other researches, the sample companies in this paper are divided into four groups according to their controlling shareholder's nature and local marketization degree. Thus we can know how political relations affect the PPS (pay performance sensitivity) specifically. Different types of political relations function differently, so the relations are divided into two types:official rela- tions and non-official relations. There are many ways to quantify the relations and this paper chose two of them : ( 1 ) relation level, which is the manager's position rank in government or the level of his/her membership in the NPC and the CPCCC ; (2) connection degree, which is the percentage of the politically related top managers in all man- agement. Using sample companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock market between 2005 and 2009, this pa- per set up panel data model to investigate official relations' effects on the PPS. By using descriptive statistical analysis, we find that top managers' compensation are significant different be- tween the groups, so are their political relations. The SOEs ( state-owned enterprises) pay more than private compa- nies. Companies in east area (where are more developed) pay more than those in the west (where are less devel- oped). About the political relations, the private companies groups are affected more than the SOEs groups by mar- ketization degree. Private companies in the west have more political relations. Considering types of the relations, the effects are different. The SOEs have more official relations, and both the SOEs and the private companies are affect- ed significantly by marketization degree. The SOEs in the east area have more official relations than those in the west. The private companies in the west area have more official relations than those in the east. Private companies have more non-official relations. The SOEs in the west area have more non-official relations than those in the east. By means of regress analysis we find some conclusions as follows. (1) The SOEs' PPS is higher than private companies'; (2) Companies in the west are affected more by political relations than those in the east; (3) Political re- lations cab increase private companies' PPS, especially in the west area; (4) The effects of political relations on the SOEs' PPS are complicatedly. In the east area, non-official relations increase the PPS and official relations' effects are notable. In the west area, non-official relations decrease the PPS and official relations increase the PPS; (5) Top managers' share-holding rates are significantly positive correlated with their monetary compensation, however, the stock ownership incentive is still not a conventional way to motivate the top managers as monetary compensation. It's a drawback of this paper just considering the effects of controlling shareholder's nature and marketization degree. Top managers' compensation and the PPS are affected by many other factors except for controlling shareholder's nature and marketization degree. Further studies are needed before we know how these factors affect top managers' compensation and the PPS. From the empirical results, we can also find that the effects of top managers' political relations on the PPS are complicated. How political relations function concretely in a company9 It's still a mystery and is worthy of further research.